Mixed reaction to merger plans

Plans for the establishment of a new, united construction employers association (CJ, 2 June) continued to draw a mixed reaction this week, with a majority expressing fierce criticism of the unclear intentions.

'This reintroduces a note of uncertainty and confusion,' commented Rudi Klein on behalf of the specialist engineering contractors of the SEC Group.

'I certainly think the Government will be rather confused about it. We are a bit concerned about the presumptuous nature of the statement of the plans and its reference to a new body to speak on behalf of the whole industry.

'There has been no consultation with others. And it doesn't really say anything about the future of the Construction Industry Employers Council.

'Nor is it clear about motivation. Is it about saving subscription money? It doesn't say anything about reducing conflict, improving performance, or where the industry is going.'

Fears about the possible impact on CIEC have already been voiced by the Federation of Master Builders.

Nigel Chaldecott, of the Building Materials Producers, has commented: 'My understanding is that this is about bringing together the builders and civils.

'I am told it will not affect CIEC. But we will have to wait and see what the consultants come up with.'

Tony Merricks, of the National Specialist Contractors Council, has welcomed the initiative. He said it was a significant step forward in streamlining representation of the construction industry.

It would provide 'a unified voice for the main contracting sector.'

Merricks added that the existing structure of CIEC might have to change.

One top contractor, however, has expressed fears that the plan only means 'putting another layer of expense in and moving members away from the point of decision making.'