The Appeal Court has paved the way for Darlington Borough Council
to sue Wiltshier for œ2 million in damages over the Dolphin
Leisure Centre dispute.
The late Judge Newey's earlier decision that Darlington could claim
only nominal damages has been up-ended by a unanimous ruling this
week.
Wiltshier is meeting legal advisers in the next few days to discuss
the setback, and is already predicting that it will appeal to the
House of Lords. 'Obviously we're disappointed. But we believe there
are important points of law at stake, and we think it is worth
fighting for,' said chief executive John Watts.
This latest phase in the legal wrangle centres around the issue of
privity of contract. Because of the Council's need to circumvent
restrictions on local authority spending, project financier Morgan
Grenfell was named as client in the contract.
But when the alleged defects to the centre emerged, Darlington
obtained a Deed of Assignment from Morgan Grenfell purporting to
pass on all rights and causes of action which Morgan Grenfell might
have had against Wiltshier. It was these rights under the
assignment that were challenged by Wiltshier.
But the Appeal Court has said Darlington is entitled to sue
Wiltshier for damages as if Darlington had been the employer under
the original building contract.
Wiltshier, though it is shortly to publish accounts showing a loss,
has taken provisions against the contract sometime ago.