Radical and wide ranging changes to the way construction operates
were put forward this week as the way to solve conflict in the
industry and rediscover trust in contractual relationships.
A new approach to drawing up contracts, backed by legislation, is
the key to reducing the industry's dire problems according to Sir
Michael Latham's eagerly awaited review published this week.
Launching the report, called Constructing the Team, Latham threw
down the gauntlet to the industry and its clients. He said: 'The
time to choose has arrived.'
The report calls for a massive change in attitude in the industry
which would see a simpler contract, the end of pay-when-paid
clauses, and the introduction of trust funds to protect
contractors' money.
And the Government, through the Department of the Environment, is
urged to lead the way by taking the responsibility for implementing
the report and committing itself to being a best practice
client.
The report has immediately been warmly welcomed from every sector
of the industry and backed by a determination to take the
opportunity provided by Latham to solve the industry's ills.
Main contractors, specialist contractors, professional bodies and
clients all praised the report and expressed a willingness to adopt
its recommendations - of which there are many.
Changes to contract conditions will be fundamental. The report
backs the New Engineering Contract as a model for the industry and
calls for changes to the Joint Contracts Tribunal and the
Conditions of Contract Standing Joint Committee to improve client
representation.
Sir Michael said: 'Endlessly refining existing conditions of
contract will not solve adversarial problems. A set of basic
principles is needed on which modern contracts can be based.
'A complete family of interlocking documents is required. The New
Engineering Contract (NEC) fulfils many of these principles and
requirements, but changes to it are desirable and the matrix is not
yet complete.'
Sir Michael wants to see legislation introduced in 1996 through the
Construction Contracts Bill to ensure that the industry improves
itself.
New laws proposed for the 1995/96 Parliamentary session would
result in fundamental changes and see:
l insurance against building defects for 10 years
l a levy on insurance premiums to fund industry research
l more clearly defined responsibility for building
liabilities.
l a new standard form of construction contracts.
While the NEC is dubbed 'extremely attractive' by Sir Michael,
critics such as construction lawyer McKenna & Co warn that he
has underestimated the enormous volume of work required to convert
it into a industry-wide contractual solution.
Roger Button, of Jaques and Lewis, expressed disappointment at
light penalties for Dutch auctioning. He also commented that
adjudication procedures needed careful thought.
'If the proceedings are too informal, the issues may not be
investigated sufficiently thoroughly and one party or the other may
feel sufficiently aggrieved to start arbitration proceedings.
'If, on the other hand, they are too formal, they will come to
resemble arbitration with all its associated delay and
expense.'
l See pages 2/3, and 12/13.
l Radical changes in contract conditions with New Engineering
Contract as model. Changes to Joint Contracts Tribunal
l A Construction Contracts Bill to introduce legislation declaring
pay-when-paid unfair and invalid, outlawing unfair contract
clauses, and setting up mandatory trust funds to guarantee payments
to subcontractors
l A timetable for the Construction Contracts Bill leading to its
introduction during the 1995/96 session
l Adjudication to be the normal method of dispute resolution
l DoE to be designated as lead department and to be a best practice
client