Two of the country's largest contractors have predicted a major
rationalisation of the industry which will force smaller and weaker
firms out of business.
Taylor Woodrow has said that time is running out for companies
relying on the loyalty of shareholders and banks in order to
survive. And John Laing says the Government's private finance
initiative is forcing a polarisation of the civils market,
hastening the collapse of many firms.
Other contractors have opposed the comments.
Taylor Woodrow's chairman, Colin Parsons, described the industry as
being in 'a state of flux'. He said: 'I believe changes in the next
few years will reduce competition. There will be amalgamations,
with some contractors going out of business.'
He warned that companies that had previously been bailed out were
not necessarily safe: 'They have been strongly supported by banks
and shareholders, and therefore have been able to survive. But
eventually they have to produce better results.'
Taywood's construction business in the UK is losing money at the
operating level, and Parsons said frankly: 'Only a masochist would
buy a contractor at present'.
Meanwhile Laing has predicted that privately funded road schemes
will not be additional to government spending plans. Finance
director Jim Armstrong said: 'I don't think we completely believe
the PFI is additional. We could see the DoT use it for a very
substantial part of their requirement.
'Conventional civils contracts could become extremely limited and
highly competitive. That is going to reshape the industry,' he
added.
Chairman Martin Laing had little sympathy to offer those firms
caught in the crossfire: 'When MacGregor announced the DBFO there
were complaints of "unfair" from some of the smaller companies who
feel they can't participate. C'est la vie. We are in a position
where we can, and we are going to make a major push in that
direction.'
Laing added the investment demands of private projects may 'be a
way to cause fall-out' in the over populated contracting
market.
Other contractors immediately contradicted his comments.
Howard Seymour, managing director of Alfred McAlpine's civils arm,
said: 'I disagree with Martin Laing. If you happen to be a very big
person it's not a bad way to go about things. But what happens to
the smaller- and medium-sized people?'
FCEC president Peter Galliford said Laing's comments about
additionality were 'wrong', and cited the recent Atkins report as
demonstrating public sector demand for construction services far
out-stripped current spending plans.