If you're still in the New Year's Resolution market, why not add a
further resolve to the list: to speak up boldly for the
construction industry at every opportunity.
Perhaps you already do. But if so, you're in a minority, and you're
not being heard. An appalling industry image is the biggest
albatross around construction's neck. It alienates bright new
recruits, women in particular; it frightens off potential new
clients; and it provokes existing clients into 'getting their
intimidation in first', and imposing such onerous conditions on
contractors that good relations are poisoned even before day one on
site.
Construction's shoddy image may be the hoariest of cliches, but in
no way does that invalidate its essential truth - nor the need to
re-address it. The Sir Michael Latham image working party under
Martin Laing's chairmanship, which reported just before Christmas,
recognises this. Its recommendations are full of sense, and touch
all the right points of sensitivity that others have also
recognised as essential. Key and kernel is acknowledging that the
industry's tarnished image is not due to myths, but to antediluvian
working practices. 'Therefore,' it concludes, 'it is essential to
any image building campaign that the recommendations of the Latham
Review are implemented fully to improve the structure and
operational practices of the construction industry.'
But there is more to it than this. Waiting until Latham is law,
when all will be right with industry image, is unnecessarily
passive. The battle to convince the world at large of
construction's true worth must be waged on many fronts - and cannot
wait for an entirely reformed industry's arrival. Construction may
not be a perfect world, but it does not need a Martin Lewis-type to
point out the abundance of 'good news' stories that portray our
industry's better characteristics. Construction's importance to the
environment, community, travel, home and hearth is immense, yet we
never punch our weight in the public's weighing of our worth.
The Latham/Laing group sees this, but shrinks from urging the hard,
immediate actions required. The whole tenor of its report, in
truth, has a ring of passivity that suggests, at some subconscious
level, a realisation that the public will never embrace contractors
with fondness, let alone afford true respect.
This, surely, is wrong. But it will only be proved wrong if a major
charm offensive can be waged at all levels. Nationally, through
spending money on professional promotional matters (Ouch! Yes, it
will hurt on the bottom line, but as Martin Laing notes: 'the
industry must be convinced of the close correlation between image
and profitability.') Regionally, through a proper push on 'centres
for the built environment' (another ouch! - but sponsors can be
conjured up by the clever); through such ideas as the civils museum
on (see page 8); and through a nationwide 'considerate contractors
scheme.' And, as important as anything, locally - through you and
your colleagues looking to spread what good news you can. Make the
resolution. Make the difference.