For CPM...


Sir; I read with interest Doug Masson's article on delay claims. He is reiterating my long-held view about how analysis of delay and disruption should be approached.

My paper in Construction Law Journal Volume 5 Number 4, 1989, describes in detail the build up and analysis of the as-built programme.

My own experience over last 10 or more years has proven that the method described does help parties agree facts and the effects of different causes of delay. It can be very cost-effective providing the initial analysis is done thoroughly and documented properly.

Caroline Cree

Coopers & Lybrand


ADVERTISEMENT

 
ADVERTISEMENT