For CPM...
Sir; I read with interest Doug Masson's article on delay claims. He
is reiterating my long-held view about how analysis of delay and
disruption should be approached.
My paper in Construction Law Journal Volume 5 Number 4, 1989,
describes in detail the build up and analysis of the as-built
programme.
My own experience over last 10 or more years has proven that the
method described does help parties agree facts and the effects of
different causes of delay. It can be very cost-effective providing
the initial analysis is done thoroughly and documented
properly.
Caroline Cree
Coopers & Lybrand