Those who doubt if contractors give a fig for environmental
concerns should have been at the Institution of Civil Engineers'
annual dinner last week.
There, in the presence of one who clearly shares those doubts,
Environment Minister John Gummer, the industry's environmental
achievements were proudly paraded through the words of the late
Edmund Hambly and in the speech of Josephine Aston.
Both attested to a deep and passionate desire to help construction
play the fullest part in delivering a better environment for future
generations. They were inspiring words that reminded everyone
present how noble a calling civil engineering can be in its service
to society.
That society at large still fails to appreciate this is a
well-established truism, illustrated yet again by public reaction
this week to the downgrading of the M25 motorway widening
programme. This reaction seems, broadly, to be relief that the
promised 14 lane sections are scrapped and disappointment that the
10-12 lane sections are going ahead.
So aware have contractors become of roads' unpopularity that
instead of dismay at Dr Mawhinney's downgrading, there is merely
relief that so much work is still left on the table.
As Contract Journal has argued before, roadbuilding per se will not
ease gridlock. Greater provision of public transport is essential
but the price mechanism alone can cure congestion. Yet while we
await such measures, roadbuilding must not be allowed to suffer its
anti-environmental tag.
Properly planned, and with accompanying traffic-reduction measures,
new and enhanced roads are still the key factor in the battle for
CO2 reductions and a greener world.
That Dr Mawhinney went as far as he did this week in adding new
lanes signals his acceptance of this fact. That he went no further
signals the need for Edmund Hambly's message to be amplified far
beyond the Grosvenor House Great Hall.