Government is poised to drop its insistence that the lowest bid
wins on public contracts, in favour of a new value for money
approach. The far-reaching change was signalled in a new white
paper - released on Monday - and was accompanied by a commitment to
cut tender lists.
The document, Setting New Standards: a Strategy for Government
Procurement, heralds a significant switch in the core of Government
procurement policy away from compulsory competitive tendering (CCT)
and towards best value for money (VFM).
It says this will be achieved by a variety of means including
private financing, market testing and contracting out. But there
will be a particular emphasis in construction contracts on whole
life costing rather than short-term lowest price bids.
The move is being welcomed by contractors who have long been
lobbying for a more dynamic approach to procuring work in the
public sector.
The paper also pledges that all departments will invite only a
sufficient number of bids to provide 'genuine competition' and says
'in general, between three and six bids will be appropriate.'
The industry was still digesting the implications of the paper but
one contractor said: 'If these moves are actually implemented life
will be a whole lot easier for us. But we will have to wait and
see.'
But Richard Houghton, construction spokesman at the Royal
Institution of Chartered Surveyors, said the paper 'sends out many
of the right messages. But translating the strategy into practice
will be far from easy.'
The Government is also promising a more flexible approach to
suppliers combining competition with co-operation. It says it will
adopt a more flexible approach in preference to seeking firm price
contracts. Emphasis is placed on the appointment by Government
departments of a contract manager and, for each capital project, a
project sponsor. Cross functional teams will be appointed to
deliver value for money solutions.
Project sponsors 'will be supported by project managers, skilled
and experienced construction professionals who will manage the
design and construction of the project on a day to day basis.
'Project managers will be brought in early in the life of the
projects. They may come from within the department or outside,
depending on whether the department has staff with the requisite
skills and experience.'
Risks will be allocated to those best placed to manage them. It
adds: 'Attempts to pass all risks to the contractor will lead to
higher prices and an antagonistic atmosphere.'
Where disputes arise which cannot be settled by dialogue and
negotiation, alternative disputes resolution procedures will be
considered.
GOVERNMENT CONSTRUCTION PROJECT:
AVERAGE COST & TIME CHANGES 1993-94
TIMECOST
(% overrun)(% overrun)
CategoryNo. ofApprovalPost-tenderApprovalPost-tender
projectsstagestagestagestage
Hospitals229 *6.713.15.9
Buildings4489.55.512.811.6
Civil Engineering8523.212.929.633.9
Roads410.72.1-1.33.9
Totals/Averages80311.06.513.813.1
*Data not available