Contractors taking over the maintenance of the road network are
being forced to confront the issue of safety, following warnings
that the transfer will increase road deaths.
The Automobile Association said this week that the need to make
efficiency savings and make a profit may compromise areas of
safety, such as winter maintenance.
This puts the construction industry in the firing line of a battle
over safety standards between road users, local government and the
Highways Agency.
The first two of 24 planned contracts creating the new
"super-agencies" were awarded last week.
Paul Watters of the AA told CJ: "Will the winning consortium have
the final say over salting in winter for example? They obviously
have to make a profit. It's something that we will be raising with
the Highways Agency at the meeting of the National Road Users Group
next month."
The AA is also concerned that the continued pressure on local
authority budgets may also compromise safety on the local road
network.
Watters said: "Winter maintenance is a worrying area. It's yet
another example of cost being watched before anything else. The
situation could lead to an increase in fatalities. Just one road
fatality costs œ800,000, which could wipe out savings made in
local authority budget cuts."
Tommy Thompson, president of the County Surveyors' Society also
expressed concern:
"There is less money in general and some counties are cutting back
on their highways maintenance expenditure in order to fund
education and social services.
"We will really only know how critical it will be after we know the
budgets for the reorganised local authorities on 1 April
1997."
But the Highways Agency dismissed any suggestion that the new super
agencies will be profit driven.
A spokesman said: "The new agency agreements are not about saving
money, they are about getting maximum value for money. Safety has
and will be paramount. The usual contractual safeguards will be in
place."
l See Business page 12