An experiment by the Building Research Establishment has fuelled
contractors' fears that using recycled materials can lead to higher
construction costs exacerbated by a lack of markets for recycling
waste.
The BRE stipulated a maximum reuse and recycling of materials on a
œ2 million project involving the demolition of a building and
construction of its replacement at its Hertfordshire
headquarters.
The winning demolition tender from GJ Gaywood was several thousand
pounds lower than the nearest rival. This was because 96 per cent
of waste by volume generated by the demolition was able to be
reused or recycled, enabling the contractor to save on waste
disposal costs and to make money on salvaged material.
The project set a precedent in the UK by using recycled aggregates
in the ready-mixed concrete.
It used 80,000 reclaimed bricks for external cladding and 300m2 of
reclaimed parquet flooring, which generated savings of 30 per cent
compared to using new wood block flooring.
But the savings were wiped out by the reclaimed bricks costing
around œ450 per 1,000 compared to œ300 per 1,000 for new
bricks.
The project also experienced difficulties in finding a market for
the recycling of metal, timber and general construction waste. It
also incurred extra haulage costs for the transport of the
aggregates from London to Rickmansworth.
But Gilli Hobbs, researcher at BRE, said: "The extra cost was
probably less than one per cent of the œ2 million total bill
and if a client wants a contractor to use recycled materials the
extra cost is worth it."
Hobbs said that while the quality of the recycled materials used
for its project was as good if not superior to that of virgin
products, the BRE and British Standards Institute have launched a
pilot scheme to introduce a national quality control scheme that
will reassure contractors.
But a spokesman for the House Builders' Federation said: "You're
going to have a very difficult time persuading contractors to use
recyled materials because of doubts about the quality of the
products and the extra cost.
"Even a mere one per cent increase is not something that can be
passed on by contractors."