Cashflow problems could still plague the construction industry and
put subcontractors out of business despite the expected new payment
rules in the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act, a
leading consultant claimed this week.
Procurement specialist Frank Griffiths told CJ that while the Act
would soon make a form of progress payment legally enforceable, the
question of how much would be paid was still open to question.
"It would still be possible to make large last payments," said
Griffiths.
The problem could hit subcontractors due to main contractors
varying payments, despite the efforts of Sir Michael Latham to
kill-off the cashflow problem.
However, cashflow difficulties could also hit contractors and
subcontractors due to clients questioning the need to pay too much
upfront before their projects are completed, said Griffiths. He
added that clients are wary of initiating cashflow problems that
could affect their projects.
Clients plan to keep up pressure to help overcome the apparent
weakness of the Act on contractor-subcontractor cashflows. They are
working with the Construction Industry Board to introduce a new
Code of Practice: Engagement of Main Contractors within a few
weeks.
The idea of clients varying the payments to contractors echoes
moves that are underway on Design, Build, Finance and Operate
projects in South East Asia, such as the Bakun hydroelectric scheme
in Malaysia. Here payments are at the developer's discretion and
depend on satisfaction with the work on the project.