Environmental campaign group Alarm UK has become one of the first
organisations to address the Government's roads review.
Its programme includes a number of alternatives to proposed road
structures.
Alarm believes that the most environmentally damaging schemes are
the Salisbury Bypass, the Hastings, Bexhil and Pevensey Bypasses,
the M4 Relief Road, the Hereford Bypass, the M74 Extension in
Glasgow and the Birmingham Northern Relief Road.
In the case of the Salisbury bypass, Alarm suggests a demand
management solution whereby freight traffic is transferred onto the
A34/M4 and a parallel rail corridor.
For the Birmingham Northern Relief Road the alternative suggestion
is that freight is piggybacked on the West Coast Main Line. Lorry
trailers could be carried on railway wagons on the West Coast Main
Line taking lorries directly off the M6, say Alarm.
The environmentalists also suggest new plans for some of the more
destructive among the surviving 13 road schemes that do not form
part of the government review. The œ350 million M11 Link Road
in east London is most prominent among this group.
Alarm argues that the M11 could be shelved given that so little has
been achieved toward completion and "the road is the most
destructive in the country." The traffic generating capacity of the
new road is also cited as a reason for aborting the scheme.
Although the contracts have been awarded, the fact that the M11 is
being built in sections means that the one part (contract 1)
nearing completion could be left as "a stand alone" road. Alarm
suggests that the remainder of the funding not required could be
used to pay compensation and toward the support of local
regeneration and rail improvements.