Amid accusations of passing the buck over many trunk road
proposals, the Government last week pushed ahead with its vision
for England's transport system by emphasising integrated networks.
Roads may be crucial to the success of its new transport game but
they are not the solution and will only play bit-parts from now on,
according to the environmental drum-banging by ministers.
Maybe the desire to shout a new transport message is why only 37
schemes out of nearly 150 survived being put through the mill in
the Government's Roads Review - despite the possibility that
another 7 could be approved and 44 more may be cleared for
construction over the next few years by regional transport
planners.
After a year of poring over the plans, only 21 of the proposed
trunk roads have been dropped from the construction programme for
England by Government officials. But that, of course, is not how it
came across.
For a Government heavily interested in how its policies and
decisons are portrayed, it might have seemed too roads-friendly to
be seen giving the provisional green light to about 100 trunk roads
in total (those announced, those passed to the regions, and those
11 passed in last year's accelerated review) - especially when
trying to push the message of more investment in rail and
integrated transport. Better then that the regions deal with 44 of
the roads, approving or dropping them well away from the national
spotlight.
regional
That, of course, would not be the whole story. Being more generous,
the 44 projects would be good meat for the new regional planners to
chew on; inheriting an agenda decided by Government is not a good
way to begin a life of local decision-making. And maybe that is
another reason why the findings of the Roads Review were announced
before, it appears, they were complete.
Further evidence to suggest the Review is incomplete lies in
appraisal work continuing on seven trunk roads. The verdicts on
their fate will - as for the 37 surviving projects - come from
Government bodies, not the regions.
While the Government's big idea is clear, the detailed message on
roads is incomplete and confused as well as frustrating and
disappointing for many in construction. But it is not unexpected.
The Government has its eye on the transport big picture and last
week it was keen to round off a whammy of initiatives as the Prime
Minister led a cheery annual review of Labour's delivery against
election promises and just before Parliament went into recess: the
arguably incomplete roads findings were finally revealed only a few
hours before the MPs went on holiday on Friday, although some
allowance must be made for delays caused by the change of transport
ministers last week.
Following a fast-track turnaround the new incumbent, John Reid,
held sway on his new turf in Parliament to the clear enjoyment of
Prescott even though his predeccesor - Gavin Strang - had his name
on the Government report: A New Deal for Trunk Roads in England.
Despite the Government's approval of only 37 trunk road so far,
many more could be on the way - eventually. While a greater road
construction workload than is apparent at present may come,
industry representatives say that timing is a problem.
Reid boasts that, unlike the Conservative governments, his plans
are realistic and achievable - not "wish-lists" which fool and
frustrate by building false hopes and expectations. However, to a
hungry construction sector his plan for the 37 projects starting
sometime within the next seven years is frustrating.
There might be more jam for the industry, including more than
£450 million being spent on roads, but the jam from the trunk
roads is spread thinly and now controlled by a host of new clients
- Highways Agency will no longer run the show (See box: Remodelling
the Highways Agency). Planning a cohesive business strategy to
encompass the roads sector is difficult under such conditions.
strategies
Commercial pressures may finally push contractors off their roads
agenda - into thinking of business strategies, deals with each
other and about attempts to seize the opportunities offered by
wider transport and maintenance needs. More creative, strategic
thinking is needed to be able to work in the new transport climate
- and, still burning with the zeal for his Construction Task Force,
Prescott repeated last week that he wants to see better ideas and
performance from the construction industry.
One of the up-and-coming ideas that Government is playing with is
to have some tolled roads as well as raising money for network
maintenance by the HA charging road users - which will help address
the planned 20 per cent increase in spending by 2001-2. However,
although it loves the idea of tolls, the Government would not say
which roads are to be tolled because it is waiting on business
proposals from industry.
Other new ideas included in the Reid/Prescott goody-bag include an
unusual move to ring-fence funds for small road safety projects.
The sum is only £50 million, initially, but is a useful,
practical step.
While Government waits on industry to come up with ideas over the
next seven years for the various trunk road projects, it does not
plan to wait for the M25 congestion problems to get worse. On its
western side, one stretch will be widened by two lanes in each
direction, another by one lane in each direction. Except for the
desperate M25 problem, the new roads policy is the death-knell for
building roads simply to meet forecast demand. If built at all in
the age of integrated transport, the roads of the future will only
be wanted if they pass a multi-category assessment and improve the
performance of the national transport jigsaw.