by James Atkinson
Ucatt is to take Costain to court over the dismissal of its safety
rep at the Tesco site at Goodmayes in Essex (CJ 29 July).
The union has lodged a claim of automatic unfair dismissal for
Health and Safety activities under Section 100 of the Employment
Rights Act. It believes Dave Smith, an engineer on the site, was
dismissed on 24 July because of his union activities, two weeks
after becoming a Ucatt safety rep. Smith had submitted two safety
reports highlighting concerns about safety and welfare conditions,
including the possible presence of asbestos on the site.
Costain argued last week that Smith was not sacked, simply that he
was employed by an agency and that his job as an engineer had
finished.
A Costain spokesman said: "In our view it is a frivolous and
vexatious act. Smith was not employed by Costain. He worked for us
to cover a short period of time. We even phoned his agency to see
if they had any other work to put him on to and they said they
did."
The union does not accept that engineering work was complete. It
says that the job had only been running 6 to 7 weeks and that less
than 30 per cent of the drainage, foundations and structural slabs
are complete.
Ucatt regional organiser Ron McKay says he had a meeting on 27 July
with Costain project manager Clive Kraus in the presence of a
Metropolitan Police Inspector and was told by Kraus that the safety
reports were the reason for Dave Smith's dismissal. Kraus
categorically denies he said that.
George Brumwell, Ucatt general secretary and recently appointed TUC
health and safety commissioner, commented: "This case raises so
many issues about bad employment practice in the industry. Costain
seems to think that the use of agency staff allows it to opt out of
having to treat its staff in a fair way. It can't opt out of safety
rights as and when it choose.
"Building workers have a right to be represented by a
union-appointed safety rep from the minute they walk onto site. The
fact that he was an agency worker is neither here nor there, he was
a Ucatt safety rep. When they sacked him we believe they broke the
law because there was still work on that site for an engineer."