They are the people clients call when things go wrong. They fix
mega projects and rebuild countries. They hobnob with world leaders
and have former US Secretaries of State heading up the board. They
are movers and shakers. They are now going to see that the Jubilee
Line successfully moves people to the Millennium Dome. And they
will do it by shaking up British contractors (or so the Brits
fear).
They are Bechtel - construction's own Men In Black. The San
Francisco-based company may be as American as Uncle Sam, but its CV
of major British schemes is as impressive as any indigenous firm.
The list is long and growing surreptitiously all the time -
Docklands Light Railway, Channel Tunnel, Limehouse Link, CTRL,
Cardiff Barrage. And, as of last week, the troubled Jubilee Line
Extension.
Yet you've probably read little about them. That's the way they
like it. They quietly appear when projects go wrong, sort things
out then sink back into the shadows again.
So who are the Men in Black? Well, Bechtel is a massive company -
$11.3 billion (£7.06 billion) turnover last year, dwarfing the
UK's nearest equivalent, Amec, which turned over £2.7 billion
in 1997. It has over 30,000 people on the payroll worldwide.
Yet, surprisingly, this giant is privately owned. The Bechtel
family, who founded the company 100 years ago, still own a big
slice of the shares. And senior employees are the majority
stakeholders.
The statistics of the company's achievements are impressive: 19,000
projects in 140 countries, 500 nuclear and coal-fired power
stations, 75 airports, 80,000 km of pipeline systems, 22 new towns,
and 40 per cent of the world natural gas liquefaction capacity -
Small wonder it is regarded by many as the world's number one
contractor.
politicians
The company can boast a long line of prominent US politicians who
have gone on to hold senior positions at the company. Prime among
these is former Bechtel president George Shultz, former Secretary
of State under Ronald Reagan.
Hardly surprising, with contacts like these, that Bechtel quietly
took a major slice of the clean-up work after the Gulf War let by
the US military. Contracts to dismantle intercontinental ballistic
missile silos have added to its mystique.
While the press clippings file on Bechtel is not exactly bulging,
their management style is well known - and rarely forgotten by
those who have been on the receiving end.
After its troubleshooting exploits over here, Bechtel is viewed
with some trepidation in the UK. There is almost universal
agreement that Bechtel managers are harsh, bordering on brutal, but
with an equal level of agreement that they also get results.
One contractor, who asked to remain anonymous, told CJ: "They're
more than brash - they're arrogant. It's also that they think
they're the best and don't mind telling you at every opportunity.
But they're good and couldn't possibly be number one if they
weren't." A Bechtel spokesman told CJ from San Francisco: "We are
out to be superior. Period."
One of the reasons for their popularity with clients is they are
akin to operators themselves. They have a major involvement in
private finance projects that dwarfs anything claimed by British
firms. "Our finance and development capability is a key point that
differentiates us. We have an owner's perspective. We understand
first-hand what is expected in terms of quality, speed and cost,"
says the spokesman.
Its reputation has already led to it being involved on the first
water PFI job in Scotland, along with Morrison and United
Utilities. It is also in a major JV with Shell - called Intergen -
to build gas-`fired power stations in the UK.
An example of Bechtel's "owner's perspective" was provided in the
Philippines last year. Bechtel's consortium won a £1 billion
commission to run the water system for the eastern zone of Manilla
- by promising to cut local water bills by three quarters. The
authorities were flabbergasted. As a client, it was exactly what
they would want. Yet rival groups had been offering only a 25 per
cent cut.
"We aggressively go for goals," says the spokesman. Apart from
this, Bechtel are just very driven. Or perhaps incentivised is a
better term: "Over half the company is owned by the executives,
which is a major motivator."
Add to this the fact that they are not distracted by the stock
market, and you have the recipe for a company totally focused on
the job. "We are not concerned with the next quarterly statement.
We don't have a share price to fret about. We focus on the
customer, not on Wall Street or the City."
grudgingly
A major British contractor, who again did not wish to be named,
grudgingly confirms: "They're big, they've got a lot of resources,
and a lot of reputation. The company's distinct advantage is that
it is has a good approach to complex projects. They've got a lot of
good people. They're paid to do a job and they simply get on and do
it."
Clients clearly seem to hold them in higher regard than UK firms.
Whilst no one seems to be able to put their finger on exactly what
the advantage might be, the indications are that it is cultural.
"You can't dismiss the US 'can do' attitude," says one UK
contractor with an international reputation. "They have a positive
approach to problems, in that they really don't see them as
problems. It is a cultural thing which prevails throughout the
States, it's not just construction, problems are there to be
overcome and not wallowed in."
According to contractors, the mere knowledge that the Men in Black
are on their way to site makes contractors stand to attention, like
raw army recruits spotting the drill sergeant striding across the
parade ground. Bechtel managers play to these perceptions to great
effect.
It sent shivers down the spines of TML employees during the dark
days of the Channel Tunnel. And no doubt their appointment to
"advise" on the JLE will have the same effect.
On a lighter note, another source within one of the Top Ten
contractors tells CJ: "The biggest mystery for us is the location
of the factory where they churn all these clones out of. All the
Bechtel people are 6'6", dress the same, and speak the same. They
are all clearly well indoctrinated."
successes
One of Bechtel's most clear cut successes in the UK has been
jointly managing North West Water's £2.5 billion investment
programme with the client. Its approach has saved large amounts of
money, and put Bechtel in pole position to take over the whole
programme from NWW.
Elsewhere, though, Bechtel's UK adventures have not automatically
had such a happy ending. Its involvement in the Limehouse Link did
not prevent the London Docklands Development Corporation from being
panned over the cost of the project by Government auditors. And on
the Channel Tunnel, it did not succeed in stopping huge cost
overruns or bringing harmony to TML and Eurotunnel.
Not that peace and harmony appear to be high on Bechtel's agenda.
Or winning friends and influencing people.
Earlier this year, it came in for heavy criticism from UK partners
over its sharp negotiating tactics on the CTRL, which is said to
have enabled the company to secure a sky-high fee for its services.
The UK consultants involved claim privately that Bechtel secured
these by threatening to walk away from the project just before the
deal was about to be signed.
When Bechtel ultimately sidelined them in the rescue plan (CJ 25
February), they were livid at what they saw as an attempt by the US
giant to ride on the back of their design work. They felt they were
undermined when the company opened separate talks with the
Government during the crisis earlier this year when London and
Continental Railways went cap in hand to the Government in an
attempt to plug a yawning gap in its finances, which were based on
over-optimistic revenue forecasts.
There are echoes of this with the JLE, as London Underground says
there is a blank cheque on the table, just so long as the line is
open in time for the Millennium Exhibition at the Greenwich Dome.
No fixed fee has been agreed and a LUL spokesman says: "It will
cost whatever it costs." Bechtel's arrival on the JLE has aroused
the usual intrigue that the British construction industry has come
to expect from its appointments.
The client certainly did its best to keep it a low-key affair. The
"announcement" came in the middle of seemingly innocuous press
release about a video showing a speeded up journey from the front
of a train travelling from Green Park to Stratford. A single
paragraph about the appointment of Bechtel was slipped into the
middle of the text.
It was the kind of thing the media would give a quick scan before
consigning to the waste-paper bin. Well, perhaps this was not the
kind of thing a client would want to draw a lot of attention to, as
a major contractor observes: "It is interesting that, with all the
experience that London Underground has, that it has to call in
Bechtel."
In the release, LU's commercial director David Bailey asserts that
the project is progressing well for opening in advance of the
millennium, stating that it has invited Bechtel to give an "honest
independent appraisal of our plans and performance," noting that
its findings "should provide added assurance that our plans are
realistic and achievable."
Such assurances are needed - even at this advanced stage when the
project should be cruising to a satisfactory conclusion. Yet its
completion date has slipped from March 1998, to September 1998, and
finally "spring" 1999. Inside sources told CJ as long ago as August
last year that the real issue is whether the JLE could be completed
before the millennium.
Hugh Doherty says he is "reasonably confident" the line will meet
this latest revised deadline. Even so, insiders say that the
"spring" completion date is being taken to mean anything up to June
1999. Against this background of uncertainty Hugh Doherty has been
ordered to submit fortnightly progress reports to the transport
minister Glenda Jackson and JLE has appointed the most famous
troubleshooters in the world, construction's Men in Black.