Exclusive by John d'Arcy
Reduced rates of pay for dismantling scaffolding and employing
unskilled workers with bogus training certification have been
blamed by unions as causes of falling safety standards.
The allegations come in a week when the Health and Safety Executive
has launched a fresh safety blitz on London construction sites with
particular emphasis on safe practice in scaffolding.
Ann Peatfield, HSE principal inspector in charge of the London
initiative, said: "Over the last two years we have seen a number of
scaffold collapses in central London where members of the public
have had a lucky escape.
"We want to ensure that principal contractors are properly planning
and controlling work on their sites as required by the Construction
(Design and Management) Regulations. Inspectors will have no
hesitation in taking enforcement action against those who fail to
take the necessary action to control risks both on and around their
sites."
Alan Dalton, health and safety co-ordinator at the Transport and
General Workers Union (TGWU), said a special meeting of scaffolders
in Liverpool had identified cut-price rates of pay as a major
source of concern as far as safe working is concerned.
He said: "The scaffolders said they are only paid around half the
rate, or given half the time, to take scaffolding down as compared
with erection. Hence they have to overload the scaffolding to make
any money. Such a system of payment might itself be viewed as a
breach of the CDM and other construction regulations."
Dalton added that the consensus at the meeting was the HSE
inspectors never went onto scaffolding jobs to inspect the reality.
He welcomed the HSE blitz.
A Ucatt spokesman said: "It is a question of whether enough
provision for safety has been built into the contract price.
"You also have to ask whether the operatives have been properly
trained and whether only those with accredited skills are being
employed. We are getting reports of operatives using bogus
scaffolder certification cards.
He said accidents in scaffolding can only happen if the operatives
not competent or if the scaffold is not properly erected because of
pressures on time or cost.
In a response to concerns over the safety implications of reduced
rates of pay for dismantling scaffolding, the HSE has noted that
the CDM regulations do not deal in any way with methods of
payment.
But, in a letter to the TGWU's Dalton, the HSE points out that "the
employer must provide adequate time, resources, and training for
employees to carry out the work safely. If he does not and there
are health and safety implications then he is in breach of health
and safety legislation and open to formal enforcement action. If
your members inform the HSE of specific jobs, whereby they are
required to carry out unsafe practices due to time pressures by
employers or principal contractors, then we will be able to act on
that information - confidentially if requested."