by Patrick Reynolds
Materials producers hit out at proposals for implementing an
aggregate tax in a report last week to Customs and Excise.
The report by the Quarry Products Association (QPA) warns that the
tax proposals are unfair, would warp the market and it concludes
that there is "no balanced environmental case to support aggregates
taxation."
Customs and Excise would operate the Government's aggregates
taxation system, should the environmental penalty plan go-ahead.
The agency issued a consultation paper in June on its proposals for
running the tax system in June.
But the proposed tax may not go-ahead. Early research was slammed
as biased and unreliable, and the Government invited the quarrying
industry to suggest an alternative set of economic tools to
mitigate environmental damage. The QPA's anti-tax proposals have
yet to be submitted to the Department of Environment, Transport and
the Regions.
The QPA's response to the Customs and Excise consultation says the
tax proposals are flawed because they focus on the end use of the
material and not environmental impact. It says that major
uncertainty lies with the agency apparently restricting the scope
of the tax to only construction aggregates.
The report hits out with four key complaints:
l There is no established relationship between the tax proposals
and environmental impacts.
l Tax proposals do not allow for different environmental operations
standards between quarriers
l The tax proposals ignore the use of aggregates in environmental
improvement schemes
l Recycling of aggregates exceeds Government targets.