Once it was the soft option to get late projects back on schedule,
but extended shift working could be a lot less attractive, thanks
to the Working Time Regulations. Operatives have traditionally been
the cannon fodder in the battle to regain lost time. Long hours and
lost weekends have often been the price paid by blue collar workers
for the managerial mistakes of their white collar cousins.
But simply stretching out the working week has never been the right
answer. Going back to the days of NEDO (the Government's old
economic quango), studies have always shown that productivity drops
off in direct proportion to the level of overtime worked. Better
for the industry to invest the effort in getting project right from
the beginning of the process. As Geoff Wright, construction
director of Hammerson Properties observes (page 22-23), the Germans
apparently have something to teach us in this respect.
Longer hours are not ruled out by the directive, but they are
militated against by the pressure of market forces in the labour
market.
The basic 48-hour maximum can be extended, but only with a specific
agreement with the workforce - and with the risk of them
unilaterally calling time on the deal if the fancy takes them. So
just imagine it, when the going really gets tough on a troubled
project, the site convener can turn round and say they don't want
to play anymore. Unless, of course, you'd like to improve your
offer...
Is this a recipe for industrial relations unrest? Quite likely. But
the flip-side may be that the regulations put some power into the
hands of the operatives and does something its drafters never
imagined: laying a foundation for the creation of the civilised
working environment Sir John Egan passionately called for at the
launch of the Task Force report.