Mansell's reverse takeover of Lovell has been called off. The two
parties blame the stockmarket's lack of interest in smaller
companies, particularly those within the construction sector.
When the Mansell/Lovell talks started, the merged group's
anticipated market capitalisation was £80 million. But a 30
per cent dive in the City's valuation criteria in the past three
months knocked a hole in that prospect and the new combined
business was likely to start life with a valuation of little more
than £50 million, hardly encouraging for Mansell's existing
shareholders.
David Heppell, chief executive of Lovell, said last week: "I am
disappointed that market conditions have intervened to such an
extent that this transaction is no longer viable.
"We will now press ahead with our existing programme to further
improve our financial performance. Our order book remains
strong."
Lovell shares, suspended at 12.5p at the start of the takeover
talks, came back on the market last week at an opening price of
10.75p.
David Beardsmore, Mansell's chief executive, said: "We continue to
believe that this deal made sound commercial sense for Mansell and
Lovell, but the timing is evidently not right.
"Mansell's board remains committed to a flotation when market
conditions are right and shareholder value can be properly
realised. Until that time we will continue to pursue our strategy
for growth in the refurbishment and maintenance sectors."
Mansell made a pre-tax profit of £4.7 million last year, on
turnover of £180 million, last year. Turnover in the current
year will jump to £400 million as a result of Mansell's
£18 million purchase of the Hall and Tawse business from
Alfred McAlpine 12 months ago.
Lovell ended four years of lossmaking this spring with an interim
profit of £500,000 in the six months to March 1998. Turnover
was £120 million.
When announcing those figures, Heppell said that having succeeded
in putting the group back on its feet, he was now looking to new
investment. "A takeover is one possibility," he said. "We need
capital because Lovell's current assets are earmarked to pay down
debt."
Last week Heppell said that he was not in talks with any other
company. "The Mansell merger has taken up a lot of management
time," he said. "The important thing is that Lovell now gets back
to work."
Lovell's problems stem from land and property it bought in America
prior to 1990. Three quarters of this has now been sold: Lovell
took big hits three years ago in order to reduce these assets to
breakeven and has conducted a review of the remaining non-core
assets.
Asked if there could be further writedowns in the full year's
results, Heppell said: "We will make some adjustments."