by Carol Millett
The Government backed down this week on its plans to launch a
privatised private finance initiative bank following massive
opposition from PFI bankers, lawyers and contractors.
In answer to a parliamentary question chief secretary to the
Treasury Alan Milburn said: "There are no plans for a state
investment bank." The statement came just two days after a meeting
between Milburn and the Confederation of British Industry (CBI) at
which key bankers, lawyers and contractors voiced their opposition
to the creation of a state-run PFI bank.
Instead the Government will this week announce, in its response to
Sir Malcolm Bates' review of the Treasury taskforce, plans to
transform the taskforce into a privatised project management
service that will help the public sector design, negotiate and
finance PFI proposals.
It will also, on rare occasions, take equity stakes in PFI
projects, but only where projects can demonstrate real equity
shortage. But this ability is not central to the privatised project
management service, and it will only have a small balance
sheet.
The CBI was also assured at its meeting with Milburn that there
will be "full consultation" on the proposals. No decision has been
taken on who will run the project management team even though the
contract of the existing taskforce leader Adrian Montague expires
at the end of this month. A Treasury source said: "It is too early
to speculate on who will lead the project management team. They
have not reached a position where that question has been
addressed."
Les Mitchell, MD of Kier Project Investment welcomed the news this
week. He said: "Setting up an investment bank was like using a
sledgehammer to crack a nut. This is a much more sensible approach
which will increase deal flows on a much better basis. It should
free up a lot of local authority and health trust PFI work which
has suffered from lack of assistance and know how. It's an
excellent way to pass centralised expertise down the line."
But PFI legal expert Mark Johnson of Devonshires sounded a note of
caution: "Funders can take comfort from the revised proposal but
the devil is in the detail. It all depends on the role they take in
funding and approving deals."
A leading banker attacked the existing taskforce: "The taskforce's
contribution to the advancement of PFI has been minimal. It got
carried away by big projects like the Channel Tunnel Rail Link and
London Underground. CTRL was not a success and time will tell over
London Underground. Apart from that, the members of the taskforce
have been most obstructive. If there really is going to be a
project management team, then it must have new members - there must
be people in it who have "closed" PFI deals."
l The Government is expected this week to announce the results of
the Gershon review of Government procurement. This will recommend
the creation of a central body that will oversee procurement
including PFI.