The scene is not Ambridge, but a main contractor's office (see page
1).
Main contractor: "I want you Mr Specialist to help me on this
project. Your contract will be worth about one third of the total
value and all you have to do is sign this contract."
Specialist: "Just a second. I don't agree with some of these terms
and conditions."
Main contractor: "But this is a standard form of contract,
completely unadulterated and prepared by that most august of bodies
- the Joint Contracts Tribunal."
Specialist: "That's as may be, but all the terms have been written
by parties such as architects, engineers, local authorities,
clients, quantity surveyors, main contractors - even Scottish
builders have had their say in what happens this side of the
border. Why can't the people who actually do the majority of the
work have a say in the terms and conditions under which they are
expected to comply. Doesn't it seem iniquitous that specialist
contractors do not have more influence in writing contracts? After
all, everyone is talking about partnerships, integrating the supply
chain, and now we have the Respect for people task force that is
looking at ways of improving the conditions for the
workforce."
Main contractor: "But it is the expertise of the main contractors
and the professionals that is needed when preparing new forms of
contract."
Specialist: "Well, it's no wonder then that JCT standard forms of
contract have such low currency - that is even before you start to
write in your own modifications."
Main contractor: "That, my friend, is the way of the world and will
continue to be so, at least for the foreseeable future."