by John Leitch
Jarvis says that it can't get onto the railways to do track renewal
work for Railtrack because there are now so many trains running
that track possession is next to impossible to come by.
Speaking last week, Paris Moayedi, Jarvis chief executive, offered
this as the explanation for a near-halving of Jarvis' interim
pre-tax profits, down from £19.7 million to £10.9
million. But without an exceptional £2.8 million profit on the
sale of its roofing business, Jarvis would have made a profit of
£8.1 million, a 59 per cent reduction on the profit made in
the same period last year.
"With track renewal work, you've got a £70 million fixed cost,
so you are very susceptible to volume changes in workload," said
Moayedi, as Jarvis unveiled its latest figures.
"Last year, the difference was that we had the remains of our RT1B
contracts for two months, possession of lines having been booked
for them 18 months earlier [the RT1Bs contracts with Railtrack were
subsequently replaced with RT16 contracts]. Then, the increase in
traffic on the railways didn't permit us to book possession in the
summer months."
Moayedi said that both Tarmac and Balfour Beatty, its rival track
renewal contractors, have both met with similar problems. He
pointed out that, with Jarvis having four-times more track renewal
work than either of these two, its access problems were
correspondingly greater.
Last week, Jarvis imported a £16 million Track Renewal Train
that will work four times faster than existing equipment. As it
operates on the line it runs along, rather than reaching over from
an adjoining line, the need for the closure of two lines is
avoided.
Turnover (six months to 1 October 1999) rose to £310 million
(£280 million), the increase stemming from the recent
£194 million acquisition of Streamline, which is expected to
add £180-200 million to the group's turnover in a full year.