Exclusive by Kathy Watson
A group of design companies is to begin trials on a set of
engineering design key performance indicators to test their
efficacy across a range of successful and not so successful
projects.
The group, which is being led by the Construction Industry Research
& Information Association, includes WS Atkins, Hyder, Mott
McDonald, Buro Happold and Amec Design with support from the
University of Sussex and the Tavistock Institute.
These indicators will complement, not compete with others already
in use, explained Tim Broyd, research and innovations director at
WS Atkins: "Other key performance indicators that have been
developed are very much concerned with the performance of overall
projects and are of particular use to contractors. We are looking
for a system where we can evaluate the design component, such as
the extent to which there was supply chain involvement, interaction
of designer and client, and understanding of the process of
design." Other areas will include understanding client needs, the
accuracy of time and cost estimates, risk management, and team
morale.
Participants have been asked to select two projects that went very
well, two that went very badly and one that was okay for measuring
against the embryonic indicators. Ghazwa Alwani-Starr, head of the
process group at CIRIA, said: "Eighteen months ago we started off
with 45 indicators, now we are looking at eight which is a much
more manageable number. These results will compare the team's
perceptions of what is a good project."
l The Construction Industry Council has held the first steering
group meeting of its performance indicators for the design of
building projects which is being jointly funded by the Department
of the Environment Transport and the Regions. It will focus on
architectural and specialist design professions delivering better
value to clients and users.