Sir,
The letter from Keith Brogan of the Institution of Civil Engineers
on the government's decision to move the sponsoring department for
construction from the former Department of the Environment
Transport and the Regions to the Department of Trade & Industry
(DTI) raises a number of interesting issues (CJ 20 June).
At the Civil Engineering Contractors Association we accept that the
move between departments may be beneficial to construction, but we
will reserve judgment until we have seen how the new government
treats the industry as a whole.
Also, we have been misled by some reports which say that this is
the first time in 50 years that there is no named construction
minister - there have been occasions in the past where this has
been the case.
At the same time, it remains to be seen whether this administration
- whose self-proclaimed goal of "joined up government" has not so
far been an unqualified success - can accommodate the construction
industry in the already overcrowded DTI in such a way that the
benefits Mr Brogan outlines in his letter can be fully realised.
A great deal rests on the successful management of the relationship
between the construction industry and the government and this may
mitigate towards 'joined up industry thinking' and fewer individual
agendas.
It would be wrong for people in construction to pass judgement on
the new arrangements - either for good or for ill - until the dust
has settled.
Only then can we can properly assess the impact this move has had,
not on what the government says it is going to do.
Phil Morgan
Head of external and public affairs
Civil Engineering Contractors Association