by Ross Pearman
The UK planning system hits industry and commercial productivity
and wastes too much time, according to the Confederation of British
Industry (CBI).
The CBI has launched its own 40-point document, Planning for
Productivity, outlining its proposals for improving the current
system.
"Too often the system is acting as a brake on productivity," said
CBI deputy director general John Cridland. "More than half of all
commercial applications take longer than eight weeks to be decided
and for major decisions that figure is three quarters."
The CBI's document coincides with the launch last Friday (20 July)
of the government's proposals to streamline the planning process,
while safeguarding public consultation and involvement.
The CBI claims that too much time is wasted in planning disputes
and that in 2000/01, 30% of all commercial planning applications
refused by local authorities were overturned on appeal.
Major projects that have been stung by these setbacks include: the
£2bn Terminal 5 project at Heathrow Airport; Manchester
Airport's second runway; and the East London River Crossing.
The CBI proposals cover:
l The inclusion of separate targets for dealing with household and
commercial planning applications, a move which would see the
commercial sector, which makes up 30% of all applications, given
more time and consideration.
l The entire exemption of minor applications, which would see
current rules on 'permitted development' and 'deemed consent'
allowing minor changes without planning permission, to be extended
to reduce the load in the decision making process.
l The inclusion of a deadline for the completion of all local
developments with strict penalties to reduce the 17% of plans which
have been decided, but which are out of date.
l Better quality planners, a move in agreement with the
government's drive to give inspectors more powers and tighter
timetables, with the right skills and more commercial
awareness.
l The CBI also proposes that more government funds should be made
available to recruit the best people for the job. The addition of
stronger national guidelines on planning obligations, which would
see the private sector no longer responsible for contributing to
the costs of activities beyond those directly associated with the
development is also recommended.
The government's proposals, which included greater public
involvement at an earlier stage and the right for the secretary of
state to rush through a project of "national importance", were
generally welcomed by the industry.
However, the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors described
them as a "little thin on the ground".