by John d'Arcy
Two new industrial court rulings have added to confusion over
whether employers may legitimately avoid making separate holiday
payments under the Working Time Regulations by including a special
holiday pay element as part of a weekly or hourly 'rolled-up
rate'.
George Brumwell, general secretary of UCATT, has hailed what he
described as a "landmark holiday pay victory" at the Edinburgh
Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT). In this instance, the appeal
court upheld a previous employment tribunal decision that MPB
Structure acted improperly in including holiday pay as part of a
rolled-up rate paid to UCATT member Alexander Munro.
The original tribunal held that a provision in the relevant
contract of employment, whereby an allowance of 8% was made in each
weekly pay packet to provide for holiday pay, was void.
MPB subsequently went to appeal. Turning this down, the EAT
concluded: "We consider that the only way the provisions of the
regulations and, indeed, their spirit can be met is for holiday pay
to be paid as and when the holiday is taken at the appropriate
rate."
Brumwell commented: "It's time the industry faced up to its
responsibilities and stopped wasting the tribunal's and union's
time. This EAT decision sends a clear message to employers that all
workers are entitled to holidays with pay, regardless of their
status."
At the same time, a London central employment tribunal has just
published its unanimous decision in a case involving brickwork
contractor Frank Staddon. Here it dismissed a claim for holiday pay
by another UCATT member on the grounds that he knowingly accepted
an employment contract under which holiday pay was included in a
rolled-up daily rate.
The tribunal concluded that there was thus no breach of the Working
Time Regulations. On behalf of Staddon, it was argued that a London
EAT last November had already accepted the legitimacy of a
rolled-up rate (this was the 'Gridquest case' involving engineering
workers supplied to Ford Motor Company).
Brumwell said that his union is taking the Edinburgh decision as a
benchmark. He said the findings relating to Frank Staddon will be
taken to appeal.