Exclusive by Paul Howard
The Construction Industry Training Board (CITB) has revealed that
the questions in its controversial health and safety test, which
provides qualification for the Construction Skills Certification
Scheme (CSCS), are being revised.
David Nichols, the CITB's product manager for health and safety
testing, said the revision was part of an ongoing process of
monitoring the quality of the test that had begun at the end of
last year. "Every single one of the 800 questions has been
reviewed. It's an ongoing product and making improvements is part
of the process."
Nichols denied suggestions the revision was in response to specific
criticisms and said he didn't accept condemnation of the previous
question bank. "There's no implication that it was inappropriate.
There will always be criticisms and you can never please
everybody," he said.
Nevertheless, certain questions that received censure for being
either easy, inappropriate or ambiguous, such as "What is the
purpose of the skin?", have been altered or removed.
And the question: "Who would you expect to carry out a risk
assessment on your site? a) a competent person; b) a police
officer; c) a manager of the caf' across the road; d) an RSPCA
officer," has been changed to: "Who of the following would you
expect to be responsible for managing health and safety on site? a)
the local authority; b) the local HSE; c) the client; d) the site
manager."
Nichols defended the process for selecting and reviewing the
questions. "The questions are proposed by experts with various
specialisations in health and safety and construction. They are
then checked by independent editors, by health and safety experts
and by an industry panel."
He added that an additional committee has been formed in response
to criticisms of the test and pointed out that the experts involved
in the revision of the question bank were not involved in the
initial selection.
The updated set of questions will come into effect in the
autumn.
l CJ staff passed the test with flying colours last week. See p2.