by Carol Millett
The government's multi-modal transport studies are to come under
the critical eye of the House of Commons transport committee in
response to rising concern that the studies are delaying the
10-year transport plan.
The committee's inquiry will scrutinise the progress of the
studies, and assess how realistic their recommendations are. It
will examine how well the studies mesh with the government's
10-year plan and the Strategic Rail Authority's (SRA) strategic
plan. The inquiry will also look at what political, financial and
planning barriers there are to carrying out the studies and
implementing their recommendations.
Two studies are already well behind schedule, including one on the
M25. An insider on the studies told CJ: "There has been some
slippage. One of these is the M25, which is proving to be a big
headache for government."
Edmund King, executive director of the RAC Foundation, welcomed the
inquiry.
He said: "There are a number of problems with the multi-modal
studies which need to be addressed urgently, particularly the
length of time it is taking for these studies to complete and for
their recommendations to be acted upon. The sheer number of
authorities and agencies involved in these studies makes the
process very cumbersome. In one study, for example, we know of 29
agencies involved, making it incredibly complex."
King added that targets set for the rail sector by these studies
had been overtaken by events. He said: "We understand that the SRA
has dismissed as undeliverable the majority of proposals for rail
coming from these studies because of the mess the railways are in
at the moment. So it will have to go back to the drawing board on
that, which will result in yet further delay."
A third issue is the multiple layers of approval that the studies'
recommendations have to pass through.
The transport committee is calling for interested parties to submit
their views on the progress of the government's multi-modal
transport studies by 4 October.