Network Rail could be forced to slash its maintenance contractor
base further and spread work more evenly to cut costs.
The rail operator believes it has too many contractors on its
books, several of which have small rail stakes and a lack of
investment in areas such as people, management systems and improved
safety facilities.
A reduction in its supplier base would lead to some of its current
contractors - which include Amey, Amec, Jarvis, GTRM (Carillion),
First Engineering (part of Peterhouse Group) and Balfour Beatty -
losing maintenance work valued at a total of £1.2bn a year.
An unnamed rail insider claims that having so many maintenance
contractors will no longer be economically sustainable for Network
Rail.
"There are too many players in rail. You will have to be a certain
size to survive Network Rail's challenge to save up to 20% of its
£5bn annual costs by March 2006," he told CJ.
The source added that as most rail contractors have an average 6%
share in the market - except GTRM and Jarvis, which have around a
14% stake - costs are set to rise, not fall, as contractors
struggle to maintain resources on small but demanding
contracts.
"Just to get into rail and maintain a contract you need high-tech
safety systems and professionals," he said.
"Network Rail would prefer longer-term agreements with contractors
with greater market share, which means some names will have to
go."
The problem will be intensified, he added, with Network Rail's New
Maintenance Programme giving it greater control over contractors.
Those most under threat appear to be Amec, Balfour Beatty and Amey,
which have a relatively small market share but the same high costs
as the others.
Earlier this year, the rail operator reduced its contractor base
after Serco moved out of the maintenance market by giving up its
£60m-a-year East Midlands contract. This was part of Network
Rail's move to bring three contracts in-house to improve
performance. The other two were Balfour Beatty's £80m-a-year
Wessex deal and Amey's £45m-a-year Reading contract.
A spokesman for Network Rail said that, while the company had no
immediate plans to reduce its contractor base, it would consider
bringing more contracts in-house if a contractor was performing
badly.