The government has decided that retentions will definitely not be
scrapped following last week's trade and industry select committee
evidence session.
The Office of Government Commerce (OGC) and the Department of Trade
and Industry (DTI) had been called back to the committee to give
"more detail" following what the committee's chairman Martin
O'Neill described as a "disappointing" response to its report on
retentions earlier this year (CJ 12 March).
During the 45-minute hearing officials from both apartments argued
that larger divisons such as Defence Estates and the Highways
Agency were abandoning the use of retentions.
But, Mark Gibson, director general of the business group at the DTI
countered: "Big name departments are making great strides
considering Egan principles were only introduced in 1999.
The industry also has a key role to play in giving client
confidence in producing defect-free work."
"And many smaller departments have inexperienced procurement teams
which rely on retentions to give them confidence."
O'Neill quizzed the officials on why one of the government's
largest departments, the Home Office, was still holding retentions
valued at thousands of pounds against demolition contractor Brown
and Mason as work nears completion on the £311m Marsham Street
project.
"It seems ludicrous that you talk about retentions being linked to
defect free work when monies are held from a demolition contractor
until much later on in the project," said O'Neill.
OGC deputy chief executive John Oughton replied that this was an
issue and vowed that the department would get to the root of the
problem.
Asked when occasional clients would no longer use retentions as
they improve on best practice, both officials were unable to give a
timescale.
However, Gibson said he hoped that retentions would no longer be an
issue when the industry reaches the OGC's Achieving Excellence 2005
target for 70% of work to be defect free and delivered on time and
budget.
"We hope to see a transition away from retentions," said Gibson.
"The target is a challenging one considering the industry is
currently delivering 11% of projects with defects."
Both departments maintained their position to ignore the Specialist
Engineering Contractors' Group target of 2007 to phase out
retentions altogether, while Oughton pledged that the OGC would
provide evidence, currently unavailable, of retention use by
departments.
The committee is expected to announce its response to the evidence
session after the summer recess. A short report will be published
in September.