The majority of local authority contracts are awarded on the basis
of lowest cost and fail to adopt partnering, according to a damning
report by the Specialist Engineering Contractors' Group.
The report, Construction Procurement - is local government applying
best value?, surveyed 528 specialists involved in local authority
contracts across England, Scotland and Wales.
A shocking 88% of respondents reported that most, if not all, of
their contracts won in England and Scotland were let on lowest
price alone, despite government recommendations to the contrary.
Wales fared better with 40% of those surveyed stating that either
less than half or none of their contracts were won on a lowest
price basis.
Even more surprising was the discovery that 90% of those questioned
revealed a majority of local authority contracts did not involve
partnering and alliances.
Of the 3% of specialist contractors experiencing partnering on all
their contracts, half of them reported that all of their contracts
were let on lowest price. Most of the remainder admitted that the
majority of their partnering agreements were lowest price-based.
An amazing 60% said that quality criteria had not been adopted in
the awarding of any of their contracts. Just 21% stated quality had
been a factor - but only in less than half of their
contracts.
The lowest price mentality continues through the supply chain, with
64% of those surveyed reporting that main contractors let their
contracts on a lowest price basis. In Scotland this figure rose to
90%.
The report did bring some good news with the discovery that 67% of
those surveyed did not experience problems with payment on up to
half of their contracts. In Wales this figure rose to 80%.
However, half of the respondents had trouble getting retention
monies out of main contractors.