No retentions. No pay-when-paid or pay-when-certified. Final date
for payment just 21 days from the due date.
These are some of the reasons why specialist subcontractors have
welcomed this month's publication by the Joint Contracts Tribunal
(JCT) of its new standard form of subcontract for use with the
Major Project Form (MPF), which was launched last summer.
National Specialist Contractors Council contracts committee
chairman Justin Perry said: "Fundamentally, this is a pretty fair
subcontract. The main contractor has to be clear about what he
expects from the subcontractor. Each has to look at the risks. Each
has to carry the risks he is best capable of bearing. The parties
have to behave like adults."
The subcontract form is a largely freestanding document. It is
designed specifically for use with the MPF, but is not dependent on
its operation. Both documents are intended for use by parties who
are experienced in undertaking major projects.
The contracts are the first JCT forms to be externally drafted by
an independent consultant. They were drawn up by Brewer Consulting
and are both accompanied by guidance notes.
Crucial features of the subcontract are that it is both
user-friendly and flexible. Under the MPF all subcontractors are
"domestic" - so the subcontract is equally suitable for use where
the subcontractor is a named specialist or one selected by the main
contractor.
The subcontract provides for a variety of options for the
completion of the design by the subcontractor and also includes a
design submission procedure. It does not include warranties. Unlike
the MPF, it excludes all third party rights.
In terms of payment, the subcontract is similar to the MPF. It does
not provide for retention. The subcontractor is required to submit
a payment application.
Other requirements include the main contractor keeping the
subcontractor informed of actual and projected progress on the job.
There is an early completion bonus option. Instructed acceleration
is allowed, but only with prior agreement on cost. A value
engineering procedure is included.
The new form provides much clearer guidance on insurance.
Andrew Mason, construction specialist with the Shoosmiths law firm,
said: "Overall, the form will be welcomed by subcontractors because
it is less legalistic and is a shorter contract. It assumes a
sensible working relationship between the parties and rewards this
approach by making the contracts much simpler.
"However, with limited connectivity with the main contract, no
retentions, and no requirement for collateral warranties, this
subcontractor-friendly document is unlikely to remain
unamended."
Peter Hibberd, JCT secretary general, concluded: "The big question
now is how it will impact on our other JCT forms."