Costs for rectifying the flaking paint on the £26m Bath Spa
project are the focal point of an internal review being carried out
by Bath & North East Somerset (BANES) Council.
The review group will assess work carried out by Mowlem between
August 2003 and the present date and will also look into why the
final bill to correct the condition of the newly applied paint on
the spa's four pools rose from an original figure of £339,000
to around £4.3m. Its findings are expected to be complete by
15 July.
Although BANES has revealed that Mowlem did not submit monthly work
claims, "an analysis of those which have been received as part of
the internal review will be reported along with other
findings".
The council review follows the publication of a report by Gardiner
Theobald Management Systems (GTMS) that revealed costings for the
project had spiralled out of control.
Removing the foam concrete fittings in favour of a stainless steel
option to accompany the new Krautoxin paint had added around
£158,000 to the costs of remedial works, although that figure
could rise further.
GTMS also revealed that an additional £277,000 was needed for
unidentified engineer and architect fees, with a further
£93,000 to £100,000 in underestimated funds needed for
the quantity surveying resource to conclude the project.
Additional legal fees are more than anticipated, although the new
undisclosed estimate remains within the overall provisions.
Sources believe the findings of the GTMS report will be used by
BANES when it makes a legal claim for incurred costs after the
project is completed.
Meanwhile, resurfacing of the four pools by subcontractor Bovitec
is on schedule and is expected to finish in July. All other work is
due to finish in time for an autumn opening, albeit two years
late.
However, a BANES spokesman has admitted that the council is still
"very conscious" that other snags could be found in the spa's water
system before it can be reopened 12 months after it was closed
down.