A furious row has erupted between three of the construction
industry's biggest associations over whether there is enough
skilled labour to supply the government's £5.1bn flagship
Building Schools for the Future (BSF) initiative.
Weighing in at one corner is the Chartered Institute of Building
(CIOB), which last week questioned the industry's capacity to power
the BSF initiative, warning that smaller builders "could lose out
on a considerable amount of future public sector work" if they are
not involved.
In the other corner are the Construction Confederation (CC) and the
Construction Products Association. Both came out fighting, with CC
chief executive Stephen Ratcliffe calling the CIOB's views
"seriously misguided". He said the industry had never failed to
deliver, proving itself to be flexible and adaptable to changes in
supply and demand.
Ratcliffe said: "The last thing we need is for mixed messages about
the industry's ability to deliver, to raise doubts about capacity
or jeopardise the consistent workflow, which is vital to encourage
investment and innovation."
The products association's external affairs director Jean Emblin
said the CPA was "staggered" by the CIOB's statement, adding that
there was "absolutely no substance to its claims as far as
manufacturers are concerned".
However, the CIOB remained defiant this week. In response to the
CC's comments, the CIOB's deputy chief executive Michael Brown
said: "We would expect the confederation to say that the industry
has enough capacity for these high demand projects. But where is
the evidence that contractors can meet the higher workload and what
are they doing to gear up for the future?
"We know that the UK colleges are full of construction trainees but
the take-up of these recruits is not in line with the increased
capacity that will be required.
"We should be developing a workforce from our own young trainees
that will meet the needs of the future," Brown said.
One industry observer added: "It is extraordinary how the CIOB's
comments have roused such opposition. However there are sectors of
the industry that are concerned that the Department for Education
and Skills could lose its nerve over the sheer scale of this
initiative and decide to scale it back.
"There is genuine concern among the smaller contractors that their
traditional workload in the education sector is about to be
swallowed whole by the big players," he added.