Part L2 software is a "poisoned chalice", which the industry will
not fund, according to the construction products sector.
Construction Products Assoc-iation industry affairs director John
Tebbit said government sloth in producing a tool for conservation
of fuel and power in non-domestic buildings could leave firms
without the means to build.
Part L2 will require firms to calculate whether buildings comply
with regulations on energy efficiency and meet targets on carbon
dioxide emissions. Tebbit said the government needs the tool to be
ready before the regulation's introduction in January 2006. "We've
got to get it nailed down by June 2005 - the document then has a
six-month run-in." He added that the industry would need the tool
finished by March 2005 to allow it sufficient time to iron out any
bugs.
In a meeting earlier this month, the Office of the Deputy Prime
Minister (ODPM) asked the industry to part-fund the development of
the tool. An ODPM spokeswoman said: "It is our firm intention to
have a calculator engine with universal interface available next
spring."
Officials considered it a "good meeting", despite reaching no
decision on funding.
However, the construction products industry dismissed an ODPM
proposal that it part-pays for the software, which Tebbit estimates
will amount to a six-figure sum.
"If it wanted the industry to pay, it should have asked us in
January 2003, but even then we would have said 'no'.
"If it handed the responsibility for it over, I'm sure we could
have come up with something, but now it's so much of a poisoned
chalice I'm not sure anyone would take it because of the
timescale."
Tebbit suggested the ODPM could get its money back by charging
designers to use the system.
He said the association's main concern with developing the tool is
finding a straightforward way for designers to present data. He
said the Building Research Establishment is the only organisation
developing an interface suitable to the job.