The quality of construction training and the level of trainee
achievement have been severely criticised by David Sherlock, the
government's chief inspector of adult learning.
"Training in construction has nose-dived, with foundation
apprenticeship success rates falling six percentage points to 18%
and advanced apprenticeship successes falling seven percentage
points to 31%," he said.
"It seems reasonable to conclude that the availability of well-paid
jobs is diverting apprentices and employers from insisting on
framework completion."
In its 2003/04 report, the adult learning inspectorate slams the
quality of much of the training.
It states: "Inspection grades for construction training in further
education colleges were worse this year than last.
"The proportion of unsatisfactory grades doubled to 28% and the
number of good grades fell slightly. No provider was awarded a
grade one.
"The quality of work-based learning in colleges was worse, with
nearly half of all contributory grades unsatisfactory."
Commenting on the near-70% drop-out rate among apprentices, the
report said: "In an environment where jobs are plentiful and where
pockets of construction skills shortages exist in many parts of the
country, once a learner has achieved their NVQ or an acceptable
level of competence, some employers place less emphasis on
framework completion than might otherwise be the case."
The inspectorate concluded that some learners were on courses that
were inappropriate for their ability. "This was partly because of
poor screening and misdiagnosis of numeracy and literacy support
needs or no diagnosis at all."
Poor basic and key skills training is said to be an ongoing
weakness in construction. But the inspectorate said there are signs
of an improvement this year with a better diagnosis of literacy and
numeracy support needs.