New legislation aimed at outlawing ageism in the workplace could
have the reverse of its intended effect and, in some instances, act
against the interests of older workers.
The government has just published its draft Employment Equality
(Age) Regulations, which are set to implement a European Employment
Directive. The draft is out for consultation and it is intended
that the legislation will come into force from 1 October
2006.
The draft regulations will
prohibit unjustified age discrimination in employment and
vocational training. It will remove the current upper age limit for
unfair dismissal and redundancy rights. And it will make it easier
for older people to carry on working beyond the age of 65.
But industrial relations experts are warning that the new law could
spell the end of the 'first in, last out' principle on selection
for redundancy, which has traditionally been so favoured by trade
unions. Although the legislation is intended primarily to protect
older workers, it is suggested that 'first in, last out' may be
considered as unfair discrimination on grounds of age against the
young.
"This is one aspect of the
regulations that is relevant to construction across the board," one
employers' adviser commented. "Much depends on the detail of the
legislation. It could be settled by case law."
He thought there could also be problems over older operatives
seeking to carry on with more arduous site work to which they are
no longer suited.
However, Mark Ellis, of solicitors Ellis Whittam, suggested the
legislation should not present
too many direct difficulties.
On the other hand, it would present employers with a further
administrative burden. And
"no-win, no-fee lawyers will probably jump on the claims
bandwagon".
Introducing the draft regulations, trade and industry secretary
Alan Johnson said: "Individuals should have the choice to carry on
working if they want to. This is not about forcing people to work
longer. It is about the freedom to choose.
"Equally, to thrive in a competitive market British business
increasingly bases its employment and training decisions on talent
not age. Employers know that they cannot afford to ignore the
skills of any worker - young or old."
The regulations will impose a duty on employers to consider an
employee's request to continue working beyond retirement age. There
is no obligation to accede to such a request. They also require
employers to inform employees in writing and at least six months in
advance of their intended retirement date.