07:55 22 Sep 2009
|
The National Federation of Builders (NFB) has branded the OFT's decision to fine 103 firms for cover pricing "unfair" and called on clients not to visit more punishment on the firms.
The NFB highlighted guidance from the Office of Government Commerce (OGC) which seeks to ensure that those companies fined are not penalised further by public sector clients refusing to do business with them.
Julia Evans, NFB chief executive said:
“It is acknowledged that at one time cover pricing was a common practice in the construction industry. It does therefore seem unfair that a small, random sample of companies has been selected by the OFT to be punished as an example to the wider industry. As the construction economy continues to deteriorate, these fines will hit the businesses involved particularly hard. They should not now face additional financial hardship by losing access to public sector work.
“The OFT itself has said that this was not their intention. In fact, the withdrawal of so many companies from the tendering pool could actually make some local markets less competitive, a move which would disadvantage clients as well as contractors.
“It should also be remembered that the breaches highlighted by this investigation are historic and do not reflect current practices. Cover pricing was fast dying out even before the OFT investigation, as more enlightened clients built up relationships with contractors and looked for best value rather than procuring by lowest price alone.
“There is no doubt that the industry does take the issue of cover pricing seriously and has already gone to great lengths to stamp out these practices. For example, it is a condition of membership of the NFB that companies abide by the code of competition compliance launched last month (August 20 2009). In addition, individual companies have clear procedures in place to ensure breaches do not occur.
“Encouraged by the Office of Fair Trading (OFT), we have been working hard to make sure that all our members are aware of their obligations under competition law.