« India's coal conundrum | Main | More coal trouble - in India, and Kent »

Do move if you live next to a wind farm... and then put one on your roof?

eawind125.jpgOr before one's built near you, anyway.

Yes, you've guessed it - I'm back from the land of the Chelker wind farm, but still with mixed feelings about wind power.

I drove past the site to check out the potential scale of two behemoths replacing the current four tiddlers (everything's relative). My thought was that those proposed would be bigger than I'd choose to see, but probably not unbearable.

This was confirmed by later driving past the much larger wind farm at the delightfully-named Kettlesing Head on the Skipton-Harrogate road; it's just above Kettlesing Bottom, of course. The dozen or so turbines there are probably not quite as big as those proposed for Chelker but are fairly hefty - and don't seem too much of an eyesore, to be frank. Maybe it's the fact the landscape already seems somewhat alien thanks to golf balls and satellite dishes of Menwith Hill nearby.

Having come to this conclusion, I was then confounded to return home and read in the paper of tacit official acceptance that house values can be annihilated by the proximity of wind farms. Not a pleasant prospect, at Chelker or anywhere else, I thought as I looked across to Chelker from the kitchen window. But then, as I drove past the iconic Ferrybridge and Drax power stations on the way down south - whose elephantine cloudscapes I've always quite enjoyed - I wondered how much more the local houses might be worth without a dozen cooling towers in the vicinity.

I can't imagine that those living in the area were consulted in anything more than a perfunctory way before they were built. National necessity and geographical opportunity were overriding factors, with a healthy degree of economic expediency thrown in.

If we can now learn to subjugate profiteering to our communal energy needs, this is probably how it should be with wind farms as well. Then they should be in the right place and at the right size - rather than urban eco-bling or unnecessarily huge moorland monstrosities - and save a good deal of anxiety (and equity) at the same time. As I said yesterday, though, the only real answer is to reduce our energy and electricity consumption.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.contractjournal.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/32854

Comments (1)

Of course, Tinsley cooling towers are being demolished this Monday, so you'll be able to test the effect of getting rid of the cooling towers!

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

MEET THE BLOGGER

    Paul Howard
Powered by
Movable Type