<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>The Greenhouse</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.contractjournal.com/blogs/the-greenhouse-blog/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.contractjournal.com/blogs/the-greenhouse-blog/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.contractjournal.com,2008:/blogs/the-greenhouse-blog//162</id>
   <updated>2008-05-08T11:46:20Z</updated>
   <subtitle>Heated debate about sustainability and construction</subtitle>
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Enterprise 1.53</generator>

<entry>
   <title>Grand Designs</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.contractjournal.com/blogs/the-greenhouse-blog/2008/05/grand-designs.html" />
   <id>tag:www.contractjournal.com,2008:/blogs/the-greenhouse-blog//162.30069</id>
   
   <published>2008-05-08T11:34:42Z</published>
   <updated>2008-05-08T11:46:20Z</updated>
   
   <summary> Anybody following the Grand Designs Live programmes on Channel 4?...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Paul</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="48979" label="Channel Four" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="48973" label="Grand Designs" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="48977" label="Greenhaus" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="48975" label="Kevin McCloud" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.contractjournal.com/blogs/the-greenhouse-blog/">
      <![CDATA[<img alt="kevin%27s%20house.bmp" src="http://www.contractjournal.com/blogs/the-greenhouse-blog/kevin%27s%20house.bmp" align=left hspace=10 vspace=10width="150" height="214" />
Anybody following the <a href="http://www.granddesignslive.com/home">Grand Designs Live </a>programmes on <a href="http://www.channel4.com/">Channel 4</a>?]]>
      <![CDATA[They're filmed at the show of the same name. Isn't it great how they've just discovered that houses - in particular <a href="http://www.granddesignslive.com/detail.php?page=350&s=1002">the House that Kevin built </a>- can be environmentally friendly? Still, better late than never. Also, somebody's <a href="http://www.thegreenhaus.co.uk/">nicked our name </a>-albeit with a slightly cooler, Germanic twist... That's designers for you.]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Offshore Wind Farms</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.contractjournal.com/blogs/the-greenhouse-blog/2008/05/offshore-wind-farms.html" />
   <id>tag:www.contractjournal.com,2008:/blogs/the-greenhouse-blog//162.29885</id>
   
   <published>2008-05-06T08:52:52Z</published>
   <updated>2008-05-06T09:10:08Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Not good news for those intent on running a business on the back of the government&apos;s declared intention to invest heavily in offshore wind farms....</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Paul</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="48707" label="Isle of Lewis" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="48705" label="London Array" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="44901" label="Lord Turner" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="1829" label="offshore" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="181" label="Shell" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="48703" label="wind farm" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.contractjournal.com/blogs/the-greenhouse-blog/">
      Not good news for those intent on running a business on the back of the government&apos;s declared intention to invest heavily in offshore wind farms.
      <![CDATA[At the end of last week <a href="http://www.shell.com/">Shell </a>announced it had <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/5e356b80-1717-11dd-bbfc-0000779fd2ac.html">pulled out of plans to build the world's biggest offshore wind farm</a>, the <a href="http://www.londonarray.com/">London Array</a>. What likelihood now of achieving the government's targets for the equivalent of 33 such arrays by 2010? What with the recent decision to prevent an onshore development on the <a href="http://www.lewiswind.com/news/viewnews.php?id=39">Isle of Lewis</a>, maybe <a href="http://www.contractjournal.com/blogs/the-greenhouse-blog/2008/03/turn-again-lord-turner.html">Lord Turner </a>was right about targeting small-medium scale projects rather than just super projects.]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Green holidays</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.contractjournal.com/blogs/the-greenhouse-blog/2008/05/green-holidays.html" />
   <id>tag:www.contractjournal.com,2008:/blogs/the-greenhouse-blog//162.29710</id>
   
   <published>2008-05-01T13:08:06Z</published>
   <updated>2008-05-01T13:36:49Z</updated>
   
   <summary>When you&apos;ve tired of building greenhouses (or green buildings - we&apos;re very inclusive here you know), or just of having green temporary accommodation while building something not quite so green (see previous entry), how about going on holiday to, erm,...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Paul</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="48439" label="Earthship" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="386" label="France" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="1925" label="holidays" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.contractjournal.com/blogs/the-greenhouse-blog/">
      <![CDATA[<img alt="Earthship.jpg" src="http://www.contractjournal.com/blogs/the-greenhouse-blog/Earthship.jpg" align=left hspace=10 vspace=10 width="177" height="133" />When you've tired of building greenhouses (or green buildings - we're very inclusive here you know), or just of having green temporary accommodation while building something not quite so green (see previous entry), how about going on holiday to, erm, a greenhouse?]]>
      <![CDATA[OK, so it's an '<a href="http://www.earthship-france.com">earthship</a>' rather than a greenhouse, and there's only one in Europe (in France), so you may have to book ahead. But it <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/travel/2008/apr/26/top100flightfreeholidays.green">sounds good</a>. And if that tickles your fancy, you can even <a href="http://www.brebookshop.com/details.jsp?id=287249">buy a book </a>about them. Better than buying another trashy novel at the airport anyway.]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Real green houses</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.contractjournal.com/blogs/the-greenhouse-blog/2008/04/real-green-houses.html" />
   <id>tag:www.contractjournal.com,2008:/blogs/the-greenhouse-blog//162.29610</id>
   
   <published>2008-04-30T12:39:58Z</published>
   <updated>2008-04-30T12:48:03Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Well, not houses, as such, but accommodation units like these from A-Plant. Funny how we can worry about the green credentials of the temporary accommodation we use when we build things but what we actually build can leave a lot...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Paul</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="48252" label="A-Plant" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="48250" label="temporary accommodation" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.contractjournal.com/blogs/the-greenhouse-blog/">
      <![CDATA[Well, not houses, as such, but accommodation units like these from <a href="http://www.aplant.com/news-article.aspx?id=2478">A-Plant</a>. Funny how we can worry about the green credentials of the temporary accommodation we use when we build things but what we actually build can leave a lot to be desired...]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>A little less conversation…</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.contractjournal.com/blogs/the-greenhouse-blog/2008/04/dfghsdfgsdfgf.html" />
   <id>tag:www.contractjournal.com,2008:/blogs/the-greenhouse-blog//162.29214</id>
   
   <published>2008-04-24T13:24:42Z</published>
   <updated>2008-04-28T10:57:11Z</updated>
   
   <summary>The sustainability bug is spreading to the rest of the Contract Journal office. This from the pen of CJ correspondent Daniel Franklin... On Wednesday 23 May several big names from the construction industry met at the City Inn, Westminster to...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Will Mann</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="17818" label="Elvis" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="1332" label="Environment" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="47818" label="Landfill" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="47817" label="Waste" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.contractjournal.com/blogs/the-greenhouse-blog/">
      <![CDATA[The sustainability bug is spreading to the rest of the <a href="http://www.contractjournal.com/Home/Default.aspx">Contract Journal</a> office. This from the pen of CJ correspondent Daniel Franklin...

On Wednesday 23 May several big names from the construction industry met at the City Inn, Westminster to discuss the need to reduce waste and increase recycling. The sky lounge overlooking London was the setting, the topic, the target for the construction industry to halve the amount of waste going to landfill by 2012. But would the meeting produce something more tangible than just blue-sky thinking?

Contract Journal chaired the meeting, with representatives from <a href="http://www.envirowise.gov.uk/">Envirowise</a>, <a href="http://www.wrap.org.uk/">WRAP</a> and construction companies including <a href="http://www.bovishomes.co.uk/homes/index.cfm?page_ID=1">Bovis</a>, <a href="http://www.jewson.co.uk/homepage.jsp?_requestid=199174">Jewsons</a> and <a href="http://www.hippowaste.co.uk/waste/default.asp">Hippo Waste</a>. With the rain pattering away at the huge glass windows, the meeting began at a furious pace, with everyone wanting their opinions and thoughts heard. The note taking process felt like a serious workout at the gym!

Above the clamour, David Vaughan, the representative from Envirowise, made his voice heard - funnily enough he cited communication as a huge issue, and everyone was quiet long enough to agree. Mervyn Jones from WRAP felt that communication with contractors was a particular concern; at least some were present to agree. Clearly BT are right, it is good to talk.

As the meeting drew to a close, many things had become apparent. Besides the cramp in my wrist from all the note-taking many ideas had been presented for ways to halve the waste sent to landfill by the 2012 deadline. But, to borrow from <a href="http://www.elvis.com/">Elvis</a>, time maybe for a little less conversation and a little more action?]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Embedded energy - and tomatoes</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.contractjournal.com/blogs/the-greenhouse-blog/2008/04/embedded-energy-and-tomatoes.html" />
   <id>tag:www.contractjournal.com,2008:/blogs/the-greenhouse-blog//162.28938</id>
   
   <published>2008-04-21T12:53:29Z</published>
   <updated>2008-04-21T13:14:17Z</updated>
   
   <summary>It&apos;s not just the construction industry and the various product manufacturers that get their knickers in a twist about embedded energy (see the various arguments put forward by the timber, concrete, masonry and steel lobies). Do you remember reading or...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Paul</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="840" label="beef" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="4353" label="concrete" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="23053" label="Defra" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="47484" label="Embedded energy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="20461" label="masonry" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="2910" label="organic" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="2909" label="Soil Association" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="4369" label="steel" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="22478" label="timber" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="47485" label="tomatoes" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.contractjournal.com/blogs/the-greenhouse-blog/">
      <![CDATA[It's not just the construction industry and the various product manufacturers that get their knickers in a twist about embedded energy (see the various arguments put forward by the <a href="http://www.timber-frame.org/">timber</a>, <a href="http://www.concretecentre.com/main.asp?page=0">concrete</a>, <a href="http://www.modernmasonry.co.uk/">masonry </a>and <a href="http://www.steelconstruction.org/steelconstruction/guestLogin">steel </a>lobies). Do you remember reading or hearing recently about a council that has decided to serve only vegetarian food in the name of sustainability? I forget the details, but the decision was based around the fact that it took less energy to grow fruit and veg than meat. In a generalised sort of way it's true, of course. But, as with weighing the various merits of concrete, timber and steel, the devil is in the detail. We're very trendy here in Sussex and have a box of organic vegetables delivered every week from <a href="http://www.abelandcole.co.uk/Home.aspx">Abel & Cole</a>. Last week's information sheet attempted to demystify the notion of embedded energy in food. Organic was best, it said (nor surprises there), even if produced quite some distance away, rather than locally produced inorganic food; eating in season was crucial. It provided some facts from <a href="http://www.defra.gov.uk/">DEFRA </a>and the <a href="http://www.soilassociation.org/">Soil Association </a>to support its claims, most startling of which was the following: in the UK it takes nearly eight times as much energy to produce a tonne of out of season, inorganic tomatoes as it did to produce one tonne of organic beef. Food for thought.]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Sustainability is everywhere</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.contractjournal.com/blogs/the-greenhouse-blog/2008/04/sustainability-is-everywhere.html" />
   <id>tag:www.contractjournal.com,2008:/blogs/the-greenhouse-blog//162.28754</id>
   
   <published>2008-04-17T06:58:42Z</published>
   <updated>2008-04-17T07:20:04Z</updated>
   
   <summary> You know sustainability is of growing relevance to the everyday when it starts coming through your letter box. Having &apos;fitted the best&apos; double glazing at least since my grandparents had it installed at their house in the 1980&apos;s (indeed...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Paul</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="15899" label="Everest" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="47170" label="Microgeneration" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="47172" label="solar water heating" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.contractjournal.com/blogs/the-greenhouse-blog/">
      <![CDATA[<img alt="mcsberr-logo.jpg" src="http://www.contractjournal.com/blogs/the-greenhouse-blog/mcsberr-logo.jpg" align=left hspace=10 vspace=10 width="120" height="107" />
You know sustainability is of growing relevance to the everyday when it starts coming through your letter box. Having 'fitted the best' double glazing at least since my grandparents had it installed at their house in the 1980's (indeed since 1965 according to their website), <a href="http://www.everest.co.uk/home.asp">Everest </a>is now diversifying into solar water heating systems. They don't apear to be registered with the government's <a href="http://www.greenbooklive.com/page.jsp?id=116">Microgeneration Certification Scheme</a> (what used to be known as Clear Skies) but if such a commecially savvy operator as Everest is now offering retro-fit systems there seems to be an encouraging level of demand.]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>More on existing buildings</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.contractjournal.com/blogs/the-greenhouse-blog/2008/04/more-on-existing-buildings.html" />
   <id>tag:www.contractjournal.com,2008:/blogs/sustainability-blog//162.28534</id>
   
   <published>2008-04-15T07:13:16Z</published>
   <updated>2008-04-15T07:31:04Z</updated>
   
   <summary>It&apos;s like buses - nothing for ages and then several together. Latest to try and do something about the issue of sustainability in our existing building stock is the parliamentary All Party Urban Development Group. The group is inviting people...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Paul</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="46934" label="All Party Urban Development Group" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="46938" label="British Property Federation" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="46936" label="Centre for Cities" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="43805" label="refurbishment" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.contractjournal.com/blogs/the-greenhouse-blog/">
      <![CDATA[<img alt="Parliament.jpg" src="http://www.contractjournal.com/blogs/sustainability-blog/Parliament.jpg" align=left hspace=10 vspace=10 width="66" height="80" />It's like buses - nothing for ages and then several together. Latest to try and do something about the issue of sustainability in our existing building stock is the parliamentary <a href="http://www.allparty-urbandevelopment.org.uk/">All Party Urban Development Group</a>. The group is inviting people to <a href="http://www.allparty-urbandevelopment.org.uk/meetings__inquiry_sessions.html">submit evidence </a>to its inquiry into reducing the environmental impact of existing non-domestic buildings. You have until May 5th; contact Paula Lucci at the <a href="http://www.centreforcities.org/">Centre for Cities </a>(p.lucci@centreforcities.org 020 7803 4306). Secretariat services for and information about the All Party Urban Development Group are being provided by the <a href="http://www.bpf.org.uk/">British Property Federation</a>.

]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>You saw it here first</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.contractjournal.com/blogs/the-greenhouse-blog/2008/04/you-saw-it-here-first.html" />
   <id>tag:www.contractjournal.com,2008:/blogs/sustainability-blog//162.27879</id>
   
   <published>2008-04-04T07:38:47Z</published>
   <updated>2008-04-04T07:59:29Z</updated>
   
   <summary>No sooner do we raise the vexed issue of doing something to improve the sustainability credentials of our existing housing (and building) stock with the work being done at the BRE than the politicians get in on the act....</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Paul</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="35039" label="BRE" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="45997" label="Eco-Bling" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="45995" label="Eco-Towns" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="921" label="government" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="46001" label="planning system" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.contractjournal.com/blogs/the-greenhouse-blog/">
      <![CDATA[No sooner do we raise the vexed issue of doing something to improve the sustainability credentials of our existing housing (and building) stock with the work being done at the <a href="http://www.bre.co.uk/">BRE </a>than the <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7325309.stm">politicians </a>get in on the act. ]]>
      <![CDATA[Another slapped wrist for the government, but what hope of them doing anything about it when all they're interested in is the Eco-Bling and fawning headlines surrounding the proposed creation of <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7325309.stm">'Eco-Towns'</a>?. OK, so <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/green-living/plan-to-build-green-homes-on-pristine-downland-rejected-803999.html">not all the headlines were fawning</a>, but the government's mind seems made up (and it appears to have the planning system on its side, at least according to Stephen Turnbull, planning partner of law firm <a href="http://www.lg-legal.com/">LG </a>- "under the existing planning system the government has a host of weapons in its armoury and the Secretary of State has the final say on any challenge or appeal - so one way or another it's hard to see how anything can stop the government getting its own way over eco towns."). Eco-Bling or not, it doesn't take a PhD in political spin to know which this cuts more ice with the man on the Clapham omnibus than relagging his hot water cyclinder.]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>New Tricks</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.contractjournal.com/blogs/the-greenhouse-blog/2008/04/new-tricks.html" />
   <id>tag:www.contractjournal.com,2008:/blogs/sustainability-blog//162.27573</id>
   
   <published>2008-04-01T08:57:36Z</published>
   <updated>2008-04-01T09:11:53Z</updated>
   
   <summary>You can&apos;t teach an old dog new tricks, or so they say. But can you teach an old building to be green?...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Paul</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="35039" label="BRE" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="43805" label="refurbishment" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="45478" label="Victorian buildings" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.contractjournal.com/blogs/the-greenhouse-blog/">
      <![CDATA[<img alt="CTF_29cover%5B1%5D.jpg" src="http://www.contractjournal.com/blogs/sustainability-blog/CTF_29cover%5B1%5D.jpg" align=left hspace=10 vspace=10 width="170" height="213" />You can't teach an old dog new tricks, or so they say. But can you teach an old building to be green?]]>
      <![CDATA[That's the question <a href="http://www.bre.co.uk/index.jsp">BRE </a>is trying to answer with the refurbishment plan for its <a href="http://www.bre.co.uk/page.jsp?id=804">Victorian stable block</a>. I was at BRE last week and it was clear that work is now well under way, though when I asked about progress the only comment was 'slowly'; as the project is due to run until September 2009 and be a case study in best practice this is perhaps understandable - <a href="http://www.rethinkinghousingrefurbishment.co.uk/page_w.jsp?id=1090">watch this space</a>.]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Turn again, Lord Turner</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.contractjournal.com/blogs/the-greenhouse-blog/2008/03/turn-again-lord-turner.html" />
   <id>tag:www.contractjournal.com,2008:/blogs/sustainability-blog//162.27157</id>
   
   <published>2008-03-26T08:56:38Z</published>
   <updated>2008-03-26T09:30:04Z</updated>
   
   <summary>It&apos;s a good job Lord Turner, Government climate change Tsar, isn&apos;t emulating Dick Whittington and standing for mayor of London....</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Paul</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="28680" label="capitalism" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="1721" label="Gordon Brown" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="44901" label="Lord Turner" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="22577" label="wind farms" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.contractjournal.com/blogs/the-greenhouse-blog/">
      It&apos;s a good job Lord Turner, Government climate change Tsar, isn&apos;t emulating Dick Whittington and standing for mayor of London.
      <![CDATA[If he was, his <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.jhtml?xml=/earth/2008/03/08/eaturner108.xml">recent comments </a>about being imaginative enough to install wind farms on the central reservations of motorways and outside every school would have created endless bad jokes (like the one above) about turning again and again, rather like, er, a wind turbine...

More pertinent than this lame sense of humour is the fact that Lord Turner is advocating the use of medium-sized wind turbines; they couldeven be described as small. This seems like an admirable approach. As part of the 'old world', the UK has a rich tradition of small/medium scale exploitation of local energy sources - think water mills and those aesthetically pleasing predecessors of wind farms - <a href="http://www.oldlandwindmill.co.uk/">windmills</a>.

The only issue I have with Lord Turner is that he apears to have changed tack. As a former head of the CBI, that bastion of free-market economics, surely he should be aware that there's no shortage of desire or ability to build these things in the construction industry, it's the fact that making a return on the investment for such relatively small wind turbines is nigh on impossible. Hence the drive to build bigger and more visually intrusive wind farms as the only way to generate returns sufficient to involve the private sector in building them; hence also the reticence of the wider public and planning authorities; hence, finally, our appallingly slow reaction to the changes needed if we do want to reduce the likelihood and consequences of man-made climate change.

The article about Lord Turner's ideas goes on to say he has written a<a href="http://www.managementtoday.co.uk/search/article/407928/books-true-paths-prosperity-incisive-summary-of-the-forces-shaping-world-economy-john-kay-disagrees-with-its-authors-view-third-way-be-just-capital-the-liberal-economy-adair-turner-macmillan/"> book on economics </a>with a chapter on the 'green capitalism'. I've not read, it, and judging by <a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/Just-Capital-Liberal-Adair-Turner/dp/B0010Z7PCU/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1206523080&sr=1-1">Amazon </a>not many others have either (except Gordon Brown, maybe). But this apparent desire to at least broach the issue provides some hope. It's only once people like Lord Turner begin to cotton on to the fact that only when we have an economy, capitalist or otherwise, that actually attributes appropriate values to environmental issues that we stand a chance of actually being able to build a sustainable future.]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Oh, Darling! You make me green with envy.</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.contractjournal.com/blogs/the-greenhouse-blog/2008/03/oh-darling-you-make-me-green-w.html" />
   <id>tag:www.contractjournal.com,2008:/blogs/sustainability-blog//162.26624</id>
   
   <published>2008-03-14T09:17:30Z</published>
   <updated>2008-03-14T09:22:51Z</updated>
   
   <summary>How I envy someone like yourself, in a position of such power, yet so inured to the responsibilities that come with it that you think a budget announcing ‘£26 million funding next year for a Green Homes Service to help...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Paul</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="1327" label="Budget" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="44075" label="Carbon emissions" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="32694" label="Darling" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="44078" label="Non-domestic" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="44076" label="Zero-carbon" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.contractjournal.com/blogs/the-greenhouse-blog/">
      <![CDATA[How I envy someone like yourself, in a position of such power, yet so inured to the responsibilities that come with it that you think a <a href="http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/news/nol/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/12_03_08_budget_speech_08.pdf">budget </a>announcing ‘£26 million funding next year for a Green Homes Service to help people cut their carbon emissions and their fuel bills’ is a major step forward. ]]>
      <![CDATA[Or how you can reconcile yourself to saying you will ‘consult’ on achieving (note – not achieve, but 'consult' on achieving) ‘targets with the potential to save 75 million tonnes of carbon dioxide over the next thirty years’. Of course, 75 million tonnes seems a lot, even over 30 years, until you consider the scale of our <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-change/anger-as-uks-carbon-dioxide-emissions-reach-10year-high-442496.html">current annual output</a>: 560.6m tonnes in 2006. In this context, even announcing that ‘new non-domestic buildings will become zero-carbon from 2019’ – that’s eleven years away – seems like little more than rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. Oh, Darling, how you must sleep well at night.]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Why construction?</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.contractjournal.com/blogs/the-greenhouse-blog/2008/03/why-construction.html" />
   <id>tag:www.contractjournal.com,2008:/blogs/sustainability-blog//162.26623</id>
   
   <published>2008-03-14T09:13:47Z</published>
   <updated>2008-03-14T09:17:20Z</updated>
   
   <summary>House and home – now that’s an appropriate metaphor for a construction sustainability blog....</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Paul</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="4557" label="Construction" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="23053" label="Defra" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="44072" label="Sustainability" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="44074" label="Troglodytes" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="44071" label="WRAP" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.contractjournal.com/blogs/the-greenhouse-blog/">
      House and home – now that’s an appropriate metaphor for a construction sustainability blog.
      <![CDATA[At the risk of stating the obvious for you enlightened construction industry aficionados, according to <a href="http://www.defra.gov.uk/ENVIRONMENT/energy/internat/ecbuildings.htm">Defra </a>some 40% of energy consumed in the EU is related to buildings. <a href="http://www.wrap.org.uk/">WRAP</a> - the Waste and Resources Action Programme -  says 50% if you include the construction process. Given that energy consumption is the prime cause of human-induced global warming there can surely be no better explanation for why the construction industry should take the issue of sustainability seriously. And if construction can be persuaded to try and tackle the problems associated with sustainability – what does it mean? is it compatible with a capitalist economic system that is inherently incapable of putting a value on finite resources? Can I ever type it without making a mistake? – then we’re in with a chance of finding an answer. After all, taken at its broadest construction means all those who use buildings, which is pretty much all of us (troglodytes excluded, unless they nip down to Tesco’s for their weekly shop). You don’t even need to be totally convinced by some of the more outlandish claims made in the name of global warming to want to join in the debate – you only need to be aware of the scale of the risk of doing nothing.
]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>The story so far</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.contractjournal.com/blogs/the-greenhouse-blog/2008/03/the-story-so-far.html" />
   <id>tag:www.contractjournal.com,2008:/blogs/sustainability-blog//162.26622</id>
   
   <published>2008-03-14T08:11:28Z</published>
   <updated>2008-03-14T09:11:39Z</updated>
   
   <summary>First there was a big bang and a big flash. Or a big man (or woman) with a beard (maybe not a woman then) saying let there be light....</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Paul</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="2655" label="cooking" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="986" label="Global warming" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="3897" label="home" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="2212" label="house" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.contractjournal.com/blogs/the-greenhouse-blog/">
      First there was a big bang and a big flash. Or a big man (or woman) with a beard (maybe not a woman then) saying let there be light.
      <![CDATA[Either way, the world was created. Then the primeval soup was boiled on a nice simmer for a while until reduced to a tasty mix of creatures , including us. Unfortunately, too many cookery programmes on telly meant we ended up taking the concept of reducing the mix of creatures a bit too far by continuing to simmer the planet and even beginning to turn the heat up a notch. Now the pan's in danger of burning dry (which you'll know, if you've ever done it at home, is a messy business and not something to be recommended). The finely honed Minestrone is becoming a cup-a-soup and we're in danger of eating - and cooking - ourselves out of house and home (that's if more natural processes don't get there first - we’ve only got <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/science/article3523205.ece">7.6 billion years </a>even if we stop cooking straight away.]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Welcome</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.contractjournal.com/blogs/the-greenhouse-blog/2008/03/welcome.html" />
   <id>tag:www.contractjournal.com,2008:/blogs/sustainability-blog//162.26075</id>
   
   <published>2008-03-06T12:31:07Z</published>
   <updated>2008-04-15T07:44:29Z</updated>
   
   <summary> Hello. My name is Paul Howard and I&apos;m looking after Contract Journal&apos;s new Sustainability blog. The blog is designed for all of you who are keen to ensure construction takes sustainability seriously, but not too seriously. You might be...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Paul</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="43286" label="Leeds United" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="46940" label="Malthus" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="43284" label="Paul Howard" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="284" label="sustainability" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.contractjournal.com/blogs/the-greenhouse-blog/">
      <![CDATA[<img alt="me%20%282%29.jpg" src="http://www.contractjournal.com/blogs/sustainability-blog/me%20%282%29.jpg" align=left hspace=1- vspace=10 width="174" height="233" />
Hello. My name is Paul Howard and I'm looking after <a href="http://www.contractjournal.com">Contract Journal's</a> new Sustainability blog. The blog is designed for all of you who are keen to ensure construction takes sustainability seriously, but not too seriously. You might be able to discern from my photo that I'm a <a href="http://www.leedsunited.com/page/Home/0,,10273,00.html">Leeds United</a> fan and have painful, first hand experience of the consequences of 'unsustainable growth'. So, apart from hoping the mighty whites, or Peacocks to some, are still around for the next generation to enjoy and appreciate, I'd also quite like my children not to have to face up to the consequences of our apparent headlong rush into some sort of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Malthus">Malthusian </a>disaster simply because we didn't stop to think about the consequences of how we live. Of course, construction in its widest sense is central to dealing with how we live. So, what better place to try and get a handle on the wider sustainability debate?]]>
      





   </content>
</entry>

</feed>
