Construction Forums & Construction pictures - Construction Space from CJ

All Tags » paye (RSS)

Browse by Tags

Re: Cost of putting self-employed construction workers on PAYE

Actually umbrella companies were invented because composite companies which routinely gave workers 95% take home pay were outlawed in 2007. An agency finds you work and an umbrella company allows you to claim travel and other expenses that you would not be allowed to do as an employee. You don't...

Posted to General Construction Discussion (Forum) by Carolyn Walsh on 11-03-2009
PAYE workers cost Laing O'Rourke contracts

I am writing in response to the article entitled “ PAYE Workers Cost O’Rourke Contracts ”. The Government initiatives to which the article refers took the form of HMIT (the Inland Revenue in its days before the merger with Customs and Excise) writing to construction firms advising them that if they put...

Posted to General Construction Discussion (Forum) by Dave Williams on 10-19-2009
Cost of putting self-employed construction workers on PAYE

I have to admit I can't believe HMRC are seriously considering forcing self-employed construction workers onto PAYE in the current climate. For companies like ourselves, who are heavily reliant on subbies, it will mean considerable extra costs at a time when margins are hardly huge!

Posted to General Construction Discussion (Forum) by House Martin on 10-07-2009
All labour only subbies to go on the cards....

At least that's what the latest Government consultation is all about - in a nutshell. HMRC checked the CIS300 returns for 07/08 and saw that 300,000 subcontractors were labour only. So the proposal is to deem payments to subcontractors who don't cover plant or materials on a job, or employ other...

Posted to General Construction Discussion (Forum) by Carolyn Walsh on 08-07-2009
Re: UCATT attack on Jark Recruitment misses the real target

"Would the 'mistake' have been rectified if Ucatt had not stepped in?" "It's easy to knock the unions - but nobody else fights for the guys at site level." True. It’s likely that the guys would not have been paid at the rate agreed for the job under the NRA had UCATT not...

Posted to General Construction Discussion (Forum) by Carolyn Walsh on 02-17-2009
UCATT attack on Jark Recruitment misses the real target

I find it interesting that UCATT claimed a ‘victory’ against Jark Recruitment on the Peterborough Hospital PFI , while the real villains in this industry continue to wreck worker’s rights under its nose. Jark Recruitment is a major player in this industry and one of the most compliant companies in the...

Posted to General Construction Discussion (Forum) by Carolyn Walsh on 02-16-2009

Page 1 of 1 (6 items)

Browse by Tags

Re: Cost of putting self-employed construction workers on PAYE

PAYE workers cost Laing O'Rourke contracts

Cost of putting self-employed construction workers on PAYE

All labour only subbies to go on the cards....

Re: UCATT attack on Jark Recruitment misses the real target

UCATT attack on Jark Recruitment misses the real target